Find more facts and information on our topic page about
U
U
Concise Oxford Companion to the English Language
|
1998
|
|
© Concise Oxford Companion to the English Language 1998, originally published by Oxford University Press 1998. (Hide copyright information)
Copyright
U, u [Called ‘you’]. The 21st
LETTER of the Roman
ALPHABET as used for English. It originated in the Phoenician consonant symbol
waw, the common ancestor of the letters
F,
U,
V,
W,
Y. The Greeks adopted
waw as upsilon (γ, lower case υ), which the Romans took from the Etruscans as
V. The distinction in English between
u as vowel and
v as consonant was not made consistently in print until the 17c. Previously, the distinction tended to be positional, not phonological, with
v used word-initially and
u medially:
vnder,
liue. Until the 19c, some dictionaries listed
u and
v together rather than successively, or
v before
u in the alphabet. The use of
V for
U has survived into the 20c for some lapidary inscriptions: the BBC's
Bush House in London has BVSH HOVSE carved over the entrance.
Sound values
(1) Formerly, the common feature in the pronunciation of
u,
v,
w, was lip movement: lip-rounding is a feature of the back vowel in
put and
truth and the front vowel in French
tu; /v/ is a labio-dental consonant; /w/ is a labial semi-vowel. In Modern English, French
u has been Anglicized as a diphthong with a preceding
i-glide (
music,
argue) and
u commonly represents /w/ before a vowel after
g,
q, and
s (
anguish,
quiet,
persuade). (2) Beside these traditional values of
u, most English accents have a further value. By the 17c, a vowel shift in southern England had changed the
put-value of
u in many words to a new sound, now heard in most accents, but not in the accents of the English Midlands and North. This is the value of
u in
but (except for the North of England), which today no longer rhymes with
put and involves no lip-rounding. (3) In general pronunciation, the letter
u spells four distinct vowel sounds, as in
but,
put,
truth,
music, as well as the /w/ in
quiet, etc. The four vowel sounds will be referred to below as the values
but-u,
put-u,
truth-u,
music-u.
Long and short U
The four vowel values can be grouped into long and short pairs:
but-u and
put-u are short,
truth-u and
music-u are long. Like the long and short values of the other vowel letters, short and long
u alternate in related words:
assumption/assume,
humble/humility,
judge/judicious,
number/numerous,
punish/punitive,
reduction/reduce,
study/student.
Variation in values
The four values are not consistently distinguished. ScoE typically does not distinguish
put-u and
truth-u, and AmE often gives a
truth-u to words pronounced with
music-u in RP: AmE
duty rhyming with
booty, RP
duty rhyming with
beauty. This change occurs only after alveolar consonants: /d, l, n, r, s, t/. Because the
but/put split did not take place in the Midlands and North of England,
but/put rhyme in the accents of these regions. This non-distinction of
but-u and
put-u has often been stigmatized as non-standard, while their occasional reversal (
butcher being pronounced with
but-u rather than
put-u) is considered to be hypercorrection towards RP. Variation between
truth-u and
music-u is not always regional, the distinction generally being blurred after
l,
s, as when
lute/loot may or may not be pronounced as homophones, and
sue/suit may in BrE have either long value of
u. Although four possible vowel values in many accents make
u a complex letter (with division into short and long realizations, and with variation between these values), a particular value is generally apparent from the environment.
U is normally short except syllable-finally, and
truth-u only arises after certain consonants.
Other spellings
The values of
u have common alternative spellings. As a result of vowel shifts or spelling changes, patterns have arisen with the sound values of
u in
but,
put,
truth, but using
o (
son,
wolf,
do,
move), or
oe (
does,
shoes), or
oo (
blood,
good,
food), or
ou (
touch,
could,
youth). Similarly the sound of long
u is commonly spelt
ew (
crew,
dew,
few,
newt,
pewter,
steward); arguably
w should be seen here as a positional variant of
u (compare
few/feud).
But-U (short)
Short
u occurs before final consonants and (usually multiple) medial consonants: initial
u in words of Old English origin (
udder,
ugly,
under,
up,
us,
utter, and the negative prefix
un- as in
unborn,
uneventful); before two consonants in some non-English words (
ulcer,
ultimate,
umbilical,
umpire); in monosyllables ending in a consonant letter (
tub,
bud,
cuff,
mug,
luck,
cull,
bulk,
hum,
sun,
bunk,
cup,
bus,
just,
hut); in short-vowel monosyllables ending in silent
e (
budge,
bulge,
plunge). A few monosyllables contain
put-u (see below), and the
truth-u in
truth itself (and also in
Ruth) is an exception. In polysyllables,
but-u usually precedes two consonants, either doubled (
rubble,
bucket,
rudder,
suffer,
nugget,
sullen,
summer,
supple,
hurry,
russet,
butter) or as a string (
publish,
indulgent,
number,
abundant). Words ending in
-ion similarly have short
u before two consonants:
percussion,
convulsion,
compunction,
destruction,
assumption, but long
u before a single consonant in
confusion,
evolution. Exceptions to these patterns include long
u in
duplicate,
lucrative,
rubric and as indicated by final magic
e in
scruple (contrast short
ou in
couple); short
u before a single consonant in
study (contrast
muddy,
Judy) and in
bunion (contrast
trunnion,
union).
Put-U (short)
The lip-rounded
put-u occurs in a few words, especially after the labial consonants
b,
p, and before
l:
bull,
bullet,
bulletin,
bullion,
bully,
bush,
bushel,
butcher,
cuckoo,
cushion,
full,
pudding,
pull,
pullet,
pulley,
pulpit,
push,
puss,
put,
sugar.
Muslim is heard with both
but-u and
put-u.
Put-u is nevertheless not a rare sound in English, being also spelt
ou in the common
could,
would,
should, and frequently
oo, as in
foot,
good.
Truth-U and Music-U (long)
Long
u (whether,
truth-u or
music-u) occurs in polysyllables before a single consonant with following vowel: contrast
fundamental/funeral and the patterns in
cucumber,
undulate. Long
u occurs in:
alluvial,
deputy,
educate,
fury,
ludicrous,
lunar,
peculiar,
refusal,
ruby,
rufous,
ruminate,
superb. In final closed syllables, long
u is usually shown by magic (lengthening)
e:
amuse,
flute,
fume,
huge,
prelude,
puce,
puke,
pure,
refute,
rude,
rule,
ruse,
tube,
tune. In accordance with the above patterns, the monosyllabic prefix
sub- has
but-u (
subject), but disyllabic
super- has long
u. In most circumstances, long
u is
music-u, the initial
i-glide being assimilated to produce
truth-u only after certain consonants.
Music-u is therefore found word-initially before a single consonant, especially in derivations from the Latin root
unus (one), as in
unicorn,
unify,
union,
unity,
universe. Other cases include
ubiquitous,
urine,
use,
utility,
Music-u follows consonants as in
ambulance,
acute,
confuse,
coagulate,
music,
annual,
compute,
enthuse,
revue, and in RP but commonly not in AmE as in
duke,
tube. Both
music-u and
truth-u are heard after
l,
s (
lute,
suit).
Truth-u occurs after
r,
sh (includingt the affricate
j) and is explicit in
yu:
truth,
prune,
Shute,
chute,
Schubert,
June,
jury,
yule. In an unstressed medial syllable, ‘long’
music-u tends in fact to be a rather short vowel: contrast
deputy,
educate with
dispute,
duke.
Final U
Syllable-final
u is pronounced long. Word-finally, it has an additional silent
e in long-established English words (
argue,
continue,
due,
rue), although this commonly disappears before suffixes (
argue/argument,
continue/continual,
due/duty,
true/truth). Final
u occurs without following
e, particularly in recently formed or borrowed words:
emu,
flu,
guru,
Hindu,
jujitsu,
menu. Long
u also arises syllable-finally before a vowel (contrast
annul,
annual):
dual,
suet,
fluid,
fluoride,
vacuum.
U before R
Before
r with no following vowel, RP gives
u the same value as
e or
i before
r:
fur,
hurt,
nurse,
absurd,
purchase,
concur (compare
her,
sir). When a vowel follows,
u is long (
rural,
bureau,
during), but is modified with the hint of an inserted schwa (
cure,
pure,
endure;
rural,
bureau,
during). Like other multiple consonants,
rr normally induces a preceding
but-u:
burrow,
current,
flurry,
furrier (noun): but the adjective
furry retains the value of
u of its base form
fur, and its comparative
furrier is then a homograph of the noun
furrier with its
but-u.
U and schwa
Like all vowel letters in English,
u when unstressed in fluent speech may lose distinctive value, being reduced to
SCHWA: initially (
until,
upon), before a stressed syllable (
suggest,
surround), and after the main stress especially before
l,
m,
n,
r,
s (medially, as in
faculty,
calumny,
voluntary,
Saturday,
industry, and in final syllables
awful,
difficult,
autumn,
album,
minimum,
museum,
tedium,
vacuum,
murmur,
injure,
circus,
radius). In some words,
u is reduced to schwa while retaining the preceding
i-glide of
music-u:
century,
failure. In
lettuce and in the noun
minute,
u is commonly reduced to schwa, and in RP to the value of short
i. The adjective
minute has
music-u.
Assimilation
Phonetically,
music-u is a diphthong consisting of a glide
i-sound followed by
truth-u, but in fluent speech the glide often affects the value of a preceding consonant, sometimes being assimilated with it entirely, as when
duty,
tune are spoken as ‘jooty’, ‘choon’ (typically not in North America), and
casual,
picture are spoken as ‘kazhel’, ‘pikcher’. Such assimilation is usual before the suffixes
-ual,
-ure after
d,
s,
t,
z:
gradual,
casual,
mutual;
verdure,
closure,
picture,
azure. The assimilation with initial
s in
sugar,
sure is of such long standing that the
s is perceived as having an abnormal value. For some speakers, the tendency extends to
assume and
presume spoken as ‘ashoom’, ‘prezhoom’.
Semi-vowel U
(1) vowel occurs commonly in words of
FRENCH derivation and typically after
g (
distinguish,
guava,
language,
sanguine),
q (
quash,
quail,
quest,
quit,
quiet,
quote,
acquaint,
equal,
loquacious), and
s (
suave,
suede,
suite,
persuade). (2) In similar contexts, however,
u may have its full vowel value: contrast
suite/suicide. (3) Some words with initial
qu are of
OLD ENGLISH origin, having changed their spelling after the Norman Conquest from
cw- to
qu-:
cwen,
cwic now written
queen,
quick.
Silent U
(1) Especially in words of French derivation: after
g (where it serves to distinguish hard and soft
g:
page/vague), as in
vague,
fatigue,
vogue,
fugue, and after
q, as in
opaque,
technique,
mosquito. (2) In initial
qu (
quay,
queue) and in
conquer and often
languor, although pronounced /w/ in
conquest,
languid. (3) Elsewhere,
u is inserted only to preserve the hard value of preceding
g:
Portugal/Portuguese (see
G,
Q). (4) Although apparently part of a digraph,
u is effectively silent in
gauge,
aunt,
laugh, BrE
draught (compare AmE
draft),
build,
cough,
trough,
though, BrE
mould,
moult,
smoulder (compare AmE
mold,
molt,
smolder),
boulder,
shoulder,
soul,
buoy (especially BrE),
buy. Although
u is silent in
biscuit,
circuit, it arguably indicates preceding hard
c (contrast
explicit). It is optionally silent in
conduit.
Digraphs
U often has the secondary function of indicating a modified value for a preceding letter. For the digraph
au (as in
taut) and
ou (as in
out), see
A,
O respectively.
Eau in
beauty has the value of
music-u. For final
eau (
bureau, etc.), see
E. The main digraphs having one of the four sound values of
u are:
EU. (1) The digraph
eu regularly represents
music-u, especially in words of GREEK derivation (
Europe,
eulogy,
pseudo-,
neurotic), but occasionally elsewhere (
feud). (2) In
sleuth, the
eu represents
truth-u, as does
oeu in BrE
manoeuvre (AmE
maneuver).
OU. (1) The digraph
ou has one of the values of
u, except when it is used as a standard digraph for the diphthong in
out and for long
o as in
soul. See
O. The spelling
ou sometimes derives from French, and sometimes represents earlier pronunciation with a long vowel. (2) It represents
but-u as in
country,
couple,
cousin,
double,
southern,
touch,
trouble,
young, with following /f/ spelt-
gh as in
enough,
rough,
tough, and in BrE
courage,
flourish,
nourish, AmE giving this -
our- the value as in
journey. (3) It represents
put-u in
could,
should,
would and
truth-u in
ghoul,
group,
soup,
through,
uncouth,
wound (noun),
youth and also in such recent French loans as
boulevard,
bouquet,
coup, BrE
route (in AmE often homophonous with
rout),
souvenir,
tour,
trousseau. (4) It represents modified
u before
r:
courteous,
courtesy (compare cognate
curts[e]y),
journal (cognate
diurnal),
journey,
scourge (compare
urge).
UE,
UI. The combinations
ue and
ui usually indicate long
u:
Tuesday,
juice,
sluice,
bruise,
nuisance,
cruise,
fruit,
suit,
pursuit,
recruit. The
i is redundant when the word already ends in
e: compare
reduce/juice,
ruse/bruise. In the verbs related to
suit,
pursuit, the
i is replaced by
e:
sue,
pursue.
Variations
(1) Historically, there has been variation of spelling and pronunciation, especially between
u and
o: in the cognates
custom/costume,
ton/tun,
tone/tune. See
O. One factor may have been a need to distinguish the vertical strokes or minims of
u from the vertical strokes of adjacent letters in
MIDDLE ENGLISH manuscripts; hence Middle English
sone rather than
sune for Old English
sunu and Modern English
son. (2) Similarly,
w may sometimes have been used to avoid confusion of
u/v (contrast
coward/cover and French
couard), or to distinguish homophones (
foul/fowl), or even meanings of the ‘same’ word, such as the recent differentiation of
flour/flower. (3) In general,
ou occurs medially (
house,
though) and
ow more often finally (
how,
throw), before vowels (
tower), and before
l (
howl,
bowl),
n (
clown,
sown), and
d (
crowd). However, the choice between
ou,
ow is often arbitrary, as in the cognates
noun/renown. (4) For AmE
-or, BrE
-our, see
o. (5) The number
four loses
u in the derivative
forty, though not in
fourteen. See
CLASSICAL ENDING,
V,
W.
Cite this article
Pick a style below, and copy the text for your bibliography.
|
It's time to call for elimination of world's nuclear weapons; Image of U.S. has fallen abroad The attitude of India regarding its current H-bomb testing is another example of the downward shift of respect for the U.S. and our present government. The snubs and rebukes we are experiencing from the United Nations, Russia, China, Israel, Iraq and others, along with the formation of international coalitions without the U.S., point to the decay of our international stature. It appears that other nations view the U.S. as more concerned with the personal lives of elected officials and foolishly spending millions, perhaps billions, of hours and dollars on relatively petty, self-serving internal issues. The present corruption of our so-called representative government using partisan politics may be the first chapter of a book: "The Decline and Fall of U.S. Global Supremacy." Joseph Grygny Milwaukee; White House should examine U.S. policy Isn't it time for the Clinton administration to look in the mirror and examine U.S. nuclear policies? The lesson we have been teaching since World War II is "might makes right." No wonder India thinks that having nuclear weapons will make it a world power. It learned that lesson well. The purpose of the nuclear non-proliferation treaty is to prevent non-nuclear countries from developing nuclear weapons. Article 6 of the treaty also calls for the five existing nuclear powers to move with all reasonable speed to dismantle their own nuclear stockpiles. The U.S. signed this treaty in 1969, and it went into effect in 1970. For more than 25 years, this treaty was successful in preventing nuclear proliferation except for Israel, which did not sign the treaty but not in eliminating the existing stockpiles. The U.S. still has a stockpile of more than 10,000 nuclear weapons and Russia has a comparable number. According to the Pentagon, we only need about 250 to blow up the entire world. If the nuclear powers had lived up to their end of the deal, India would almost certainly not be pursuing its current course. Catherine Vint Wauwatosa
Newspaper article from: The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel; 5/20/1998; 700+ words
; ...country, without exception. It makes a mockery of the treaty to accommodate the big five France, Britain, Russia, China and the U.S. keeping some nuclear weapons while no other nation should dream of building any. A situation in which such idea rules makes...
|
|
In U.K. litigation between anonymous U.S. insured and U.K. insurer, Court of Appeal (Civil Division) rules that parties' agreement to arbitrate in London signified applicability of English rather than U.S. law thus warranting an English injunction against insurer's plans to bring suit in U.S. courts in order to invoke more favorable U.S. law in attacking arbitrators' partial award.
Newspaper article from: International Law Update; 2/1/2008; 700+ words
; ...that the law governing the arbitration was the U.K. Arbitration Act of 1996. The arbitrators...Defendant hinted that it was thinking of applying to a U.S. Federal Court where the court would apply U.S. federal arbitration law governing the enforcement...
|
|
U.S. DEPUTY PERMANENT REPRESENTATIVE TO THE U.N. ALEJANDRO WOLFF U.S. DEPUTY PERMANENT REPRESENTATIVE TO THE U.N. ALEJANDRO WOLFF DELIVERS REMARKS ON U.N. SYSTEM-WIDE COHERENCE
Transcript from: Washington Transcript Service; 3/28/2008; 700+ words
; ...Service 03-28-2008 DEPUTY PERMANENT REPRESENTATIVE WOLFF DELIVERS REMARKS ON U.N. SYSTEM-WIDE COHERENCE, NEW YORK CITY, AS RELEASED BY THE U.S. MISSION TO THE U.N. MARCH 28, 2008 SPEAKER: U.S. DEPUTY PERMANENT REPRESENTATIVE TO THE...
|
|
COMMENTARY: W h a s s s s s s s u u u u u u u p ?
News Wire article from: University Wire; 4/6/2000; ; 487 words
; Toyin Akinmusuru University Wire 04-06-2000 (Michigan Daily) (U-WIRE) ANN ARBOR, Mich. -- A series of Budweiser commercials launched during...Whassup?" won't be in this magazine next year. (C) 2000 Michigan Daily via U-WIRE
|
|
U.S. 4th Circuit Court: U.S. v. Hatcher, U.S. v. Hinen, U.S. v. Roberts, U.S. v. Sawn
Newspaper article from: The Daily Record (Baltimore); 4/6/2009; 700+ words
; ...as required by SORNA, in violation of 18 U.S.C. [section]2250(a). Each of...the registration of those offenders." 42 U.S.C.A. [section]16901. Sex offenders...days of being sentenced for the offense. 42 U.S.C.A. [section]16913(b). According...
|
|
U.S. PUBLIC DELEGATE TO THE U.N. RODGE YOUNG U.S. PUBLIC DELEGATE TO THE U.N. RODGE YOUNG DELIVERS REMARKS TO THE U.N. GENERAL ASSEMBLY
Transcript from: Washington Transcript Service; 10/8/2007; 700+ words
; ...08-2007 DELEGATE YOUNG DELIVERS REMARKS TO THE U.N. GENERAL ASSEMBLY, NEW YORK CITY, AS PREPARED FOR DELIVERY, AS RELEASED BY THE U.N. OCTOBER 8, 2007 SPEAKER: U.S. PUBLIC DELEGATE TO THE UN RODGE YOUNG...
|
|
U.S. AMBASSADOR TO THE U.N. ZALMAY KHALILZAD U.S. AMBASSADOR TO THE U.N. ZALMAY KHALILZAD DELIVERS REMARKS AT THE U.S. MARINE CORPS BIRTHDAY
Transcript from: Washington Transcript Service; 11/7/2007; 700+ words
; ...Washington Transcript Service 11-07-2007 AMBASSADOR KHALILZAD DELIVERS REMARKS AT THE U.S. MARINE CORPS BIRTHDAY, AS RELEASED BY THE U.S. MISSION TO THE U.N. NOVEMBER 7, 2007 SPEAKER: U.S. AMBASSADOR TO THE U.N. ZALMAY KHALILZAD...
|
|
U.S. AMBASSADOR TO THE U.N. ZALMAY KHALILZAD U.S. AMBASSADOR TO THE U.N. ZALMAY KHALILZAD DELIVERS REMARKS ON U.N. SECURITY COUNCIL REFORM
Transcript from: Washington Transcript Service; 11/12/2007; 700+ words
; ...12-2007 AMBASSADOR KHALILZAD DELIVERS REMARKS ON U.N. SECURITY COUNCIL REFORM, NEW YORK CITY, AS PREPARED FOR DELIVERY, AS RELEASED BY THE U.S. MISSION TO THE U.N. NOVEMBER 12, 2007 SPEAKER: U.S. AMBASSADOR...
|
|
Emotion, finger-pointing interfere with dialogue about Middle East; Keep U.S. interests first Bravo and accolades to Robert Ashmore for his column (Crossroads, Sept. 21). It was well-written and said what needed to be said in a forthright manner. Let everyone do what's right for the U.S. and not be so blatantly biased in favor of the country from which one's ancestors came. Pride for one's historical background is certainly appropriate, but let's remember the "one from many" concept and keep U.S. interests first. And let the Jews admit to the fact that they weren't the only ones persecuted. It seems to me they are now the persecutors of the Palestinians. Richard T. Baumann Cascade; What was expected? The media liberal as well as conservative have been overwhelmingly in support of the Israelis in their ongoing conflict with the Palestinians. It is time to take a look at events which have caused the present situation. At the end of World War II, Israel, which was then called Palestine, was a protectorate of Great Britain and was inhabited mainly by the people we now call Palestinians and a small minority of Jews. The U.S. and Great Britain decided that Palestine should be a homeland for the Jews and promoted the emigration of thousands of Jews to Palestine. Up to that time there was little friction between Jews and Palestinians. But the Jews wanted a country based on the Jewish religion. Violence erupted and there was a great deal of terrorism by both sides. Palestine was divided between the Jews and Palestinians with the Jews getting the majority of the land. This resulted in a war that was won by the Israelis, and then the Palestinians had nothing. They were forced into a few strips of land and these areas are now threatened. What does anyone expect would happen? Kenneth J. Merkel Colgate; Israel is not a racist state Robert Ashmore wrote that the U.S. government supports Israel because of Jewish money and that Israel is a "racist, religiously bigoted" state that sponsors state terrorism and systematic torture. Money can't buy everything, so clearly Israel's saga strikes a certain moral chord in the hearts of millions of Americans. How else can one explain why the U.S. so vociferously supports the Jewish state? It is not as if the Arabs are lacking financial resources. After Egypt and Syria attacked Israel in 1973, the Arab world placed an oil embargo on America. Arabs control most of the world's oil resources and Arabs who reside in the U.S. have every right to lobby their elected officials. Israel is not a racist state, as its enemies like to believe. If we want to talk about racism, perhaps we should listen to the Arafat appointee who recently referred to Jews as "sons of monkeys and pigs." Zak Mazur Milwaukee
Newspaper article from: The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel; 9/29/1997; 700+ words
; ...Ashmore, bent on pointing fingers at the U.S. and Israel, creating conspiracy theories...region riddled with authoritarian regimes, U.S. support of Israel protects vital security...has been an invaluable ally, protecting U.S. interests not only in the Middle East...
|
|
U.S. AMBASSADOR TO THE U.N., GENEVA, WARREN W. TICHENOR U.S. AMBASSADOR TO THE U.N., GENEVA, WARREN W. TICHENOR DELIVERS REMARKS AT THE U.N. HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL SPECIAL SESSION ON SUDAN
Transcript from: Washington Transcript Service; 12/13/2006; 674 words
; ...13-2006 AMBASSADOR TICHENOR DELIVERS REMARKS AT THE U.N. HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL SPECIAL SESSION ON SUDAN...BY THE STATE DEPARTMENT DECEMBER 12, 2006 SPEAKER: U.S. AMBASSADOR TO THE U.N. GENEVA, WARREN W. TICHENOR [*] TICHENOR: The...
|
|
U.S. Army Europe/Seventh U.S. Army
Book article from: The Oxford Essential Dictionary of the U.S. Military
U.S. Army Europe/Seventh U.S. Army (USAREUR/Seventh Army) the Army component of the U.S. European Command (USEUCOM) commanded by a U.S. Army four-star general (Commanding General, USAREUR/Seventh Army) from headquarters...
|
|
U AND NON-U
Book article from: Concise Oxford Companion to the English Language
U AND NON-U. Upper-class and non-upper-class usage, linguistic and social: terms...served as social clues inspired over the next few years a search for further U-isms and non-U-isms: ‘Fault , also , Balkans are pronounced...
|
|
Dennis v. U.S. Appeal: 1951
Book article from: Great American Trials
Dennis v. U.S. Appeal: 1951 Appellants: Benjamin Davis...other provisions of the Bill of Rights of the U.S. Constitution Chief Defense Lawyers...Rights in a 6-2 decision. SIGNIFICANCE: The U.S. Supreme Court's review of this case...
|
|
U.S. v. Hoffa: 1964
Book article from: Great American Trials
U.S. v. Hoffa: 1964 Defendants: James R...four concurrent five-year terms SIGNIFICANCE: U.S. Department of Justice prosecutions of union...government should investigate an individual. The U.S. government's attempts to curtail the...
|
|
U.S. v. Snepp Appeal: 1980
Book article from: Great American Trials
U.S. v. Snepp Appeal: 1980 Appellant: Frank...15, 1978, the government sued Snepp in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District...government's favor on July 7, 1978, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit...
|