nuclear disarmament
The Columbia Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition | Date: 2008
nuclear disarmament the reduction and limitation of the various nuclear weapons in the military forces of the world's nations. The atomic bombs dropped (1945) on Japan by the United States in World War II demonstrated the overwhelming destructive potential of nuclear weapons and the threat to humanity posed by the possibility of nuclear war and led to calls for controls on or elimination of such weapons.
Public Pressure
Some of the scientists who helped make the bomb started the Union of Concerned Scientists, and since then many public groups have formed to campaign for disarmament, including the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND) in Great Britain, SANE and the Nuclear Freeze in the United States, and the worldwide Physicians for Social Responsibility. In addition, many local antiwar, ecological, and women's groups have focused on nuclear issues. Disarmament advocates have used political campaigns, mass rallies, blockades of facilities where weapons are manufactured or stored, and even attacks on nuclear weapons themselves, called "ploughshare actions." Disarmament groups have long opposed nuclear testing, beginning with the protests leading up to the Moscow Agreement of 1963, a partial test ban. More recently, the international ecological group Greenpeace tried to disrupt French nuclear testing in the Pacific, and there were coordinated protest campaigns against testing in Kazakhstan and in Nevada.
International Agreements
Official efforts at arms control have made some progress, but only very slowly. The first resolution (1946) of the General Assembly of the United Nations set up an Atomic Energy Commission to make proposals for the peaceful uses of atomic energy and for the elimination of weapons of mass destruction. The commission concentrated debate on the Baruch Plan for an international agency to control atomic power and weapons and passed it, but the plan was vetoed by the USSR in the Security Council. As the cold war progressed, the commission reached an impasse (1948). With the proliferation of nuclear weapons, concern over the situation became more acute.
In 1952 a UN Disarmament Commission was formed under the Security Council. It became the repository for all disarmament proposals under UN auspices. In 1953 a commission subcommittee was set up, consisting of Canada, France, Great Britain, the United States, and the USSR. In this subcommittee, which met intermittently from 1954 to 1957, there was basic disagreement between East and West. The West held that an international control system and on-site inspection must be developed before disarmament could proceed; the USSR stated that the Western position would result in inspection without disarmament and proposed instead an immediate ban on nuclear weapons, without inspection but with possible later, but unspecified, controls. Conferences among the United States, Great Britain, and the Soviet Union on the formulation of a treaty to ban nuclear testing began in Geneva in 1958. The same year these three powers agreed to suspend nuclear testing for one year. The voluntary moratorium continued until it was broken by the Soviet resumption of testing (1961).
The UN Disarmament Commission, expanded (1958) to include all members of the United Nations, was reduced in 1962 to 18 members. Soon afterward, France withdrew. In 1963 the United States, Great Britain, and the Soviet Union reached the Moscow Agreement, which banned testing in the atmosphere, in outer space, and underwater. Other discussions were conducted simultaneously by the 18-member UN Disarmament Commission. No agreement was reached on arms limitation, although the Soviet Union and the United States moved closer together on the issue of the proliferation of nuclear weapons. The two countries proposed (1968) to the commission a 25-year nonproliferation agreement that was later approved by the UN General Assembly and took effect in 1970; it was made permament in 1995. By the end of the century the treaty had been ratified by all nations save Cuba, Israel, Pakistan, and India. North Korea threatened to withdraw in the 1990s and did so in 2003. Pakistan and India have tested nuclear weapons, North Korea has conducted a subkiloton nuclear test, and Israel is believed to have nuclear weapons. Argentina, Brazil, Iran, Iraq, Libya, and South Africa are known to have or are suspected of having attempted to develop nuclear weapons; South Africa actually produced a small nuclear arsenal but later disarmed.
A comprehensive test ban treaty was approved by the UN General Assembly and signed in 1996; over 170 nations have now signed. The treaty prohibits all nuclear testing, establishes a worldwide network of monitoring stations, and allows for inspections of suspicious sites. Conservative opposition to the treaty in the United States led the Senate to reject ratification in 1999; it was ratified by Russia in 2000.
The Soviet Union and the United States began Strategic Arms Limitation Talks (SALT) in the late 1960s, and in 1972 agreed to limit antiballistic missiles (ABMs) and reached an interim accord limiting intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs). Another interim SALT agreement was reached in Nov., 1974, that limited ballistic missile launchers. SALT II, which banned new ICBMs and limited other delivery vehicles, was signed in 1979. It was never ratified, but both countries announced they would adhere to it.
In 1982 the United States and Soviet Union began a new set of negotiations, called START (Strategic Arms Reduction Talks). In 1987, President Reagan and Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev signed the INF treaty to eliminate intermediate-range nuclear forces, and a START treaty, signed by President George H. W. Bush and Gorbachev in 1991, called for additional reductions in U.S. and Soviet nuclear arsenals and on-site inspections. In response to increasing Soviet political instability, Bush announced (1991) the elimination of most U.S. tactical nuclear arms, took strategic bombers off alert status, and called for further reductions in ballistic missiles.
With the USSR's disintegration, its nuclear arms passed to Belarus, Kazakhstan, Russia, and Ukraine. The republics pledged to abide by existing treaties and remove outlying weapons to Russia for destruction. In 1993, Bush and Russian president Yeltsin signed a START II treaty that called for cutting nuclear warheads by two thirds by 2003 and eliminating those weapons most likely to be used in a first strike. Ukraine, fearing Russian domination, did not ratify START and the 1970 nonproliferation treaty until 1994, but by 1996 the nuclear arsenals of Belarus, Kazakstan, and Ukraine had been dismantled. In 1997, Yeltsin and U.S. president Bill Clinton set a goal of further reducing the number of each nation's warheads to 2,500 or less, less than half that permitted under START II. President George W. Bush, regarding earlier arms agreements and the need for them as cold war relics, in 2001 agreed with Russian president Putin to reduce the number of warheads over the next decade to roughly two thirds that called for in START II, while at the same time essentially abandoning that agreement (which was still unratified by the United States) and its restrictions on the types of weapons permitted. This agreement was formalized in the May, 2002, Moscow Treaty. However, under the treaty, both nations are allowed to store the weapons that they remove from deployment, and the accord has been criticized for its lack of a mechanism to verify compliance. Following the U.S. abandonment of the ABM treaty (see below), Russia announced that it would no longer be bound by START II.
In 1983, President Reagan proposed the development of a U.S. space-based defensive system to act as a shield against a missile attack. The Strategic Defense Initiative , or "Star Wars" as it was popularly known, was ultimately abandoned by the United States, but a more limited missile-defense system using ground-based missiles to provide protection against an accidental launching of a ballistic missile or against a missile attack from a "rogue" nation was proposed in 1991 by President G. H. W. Bush. Such a system would contravene the 1972 ABM treaty and was objected to by Russia, but development and testing proceeded during the 1990s. In 2001, President George W. Bush proposed accelerating and expanding the development and deployment of the system and called for the ABM treaty to be replaced by a new "framework" that would permit such defenses. The United States announced that it would withdraw from the ABM treaty in Dec., 2001, and officially withdrew in June, 2002.
Bibliography
See W. Epstein and B. Feld, New Directions in Disarmament (1981); J. Schell, The Abolition (1986); M. Thee, Arms and Disarmament (1987).
Author not available, DISARMAMENT, NUCLEAR.,
The Columbia Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition 2008
The Columbia Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition. Copyright 2008 Columbia University Press
Related newspaper, magazine, and journal articles from HighBeam Research
|
Delegitimizing nuclear weapons: the United States should take the lead in making the use of nuclear weapons unacceptable under any but the most extenuating circumstances.
Issues in Science and Technology; 3/22/2006; Mendelsohn, Jack; 4546 words
; The most urgent national security issue facing the United States is the possibility that a nuclear weapon might be used against this nation as an instrument of war or terror. If we are to avoid such a catastrophe and its unprecedented environmental, economic, and social effects, this threat must be
Read more
|
|
Space cops: coming to a planet near you! No one within the administration or the nuclear weapons establishment is publicly advocating placing low-yield weapons in space--yet. Here's how it might happen.
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists; 11/1/2003; Moore, Mike; 7044 words
; ... than in the United States. But in the United States, it is a non-issue. The topic is arcane, mathematical, hard to handle on TV news channels, and certainly unpopular with a Republican Party that likes to buy votes with tax cuts and a Democratic Party that has ...
Read more
|
|
Into the valley of the shadow: the United States' nuclear posture review indicates that we are entering a period of unprecedented global hazard. Can an emerging global consciousness prevent global destruction?
Arena Magazine; 4/1/2002; Hinkson, John; 1362 words
; Recent releases from the US archives have confirmed that in the darkest days of the Vietnam War, Richard Nixon proposed the use of nuclear weapons in order to gain victory, and that the principal opponent of the policy was Henry Kissinger. Kissinger was no dove, to say the least; his opposition to
Read more
|
|
Will the United States take the lead?(Brief Article)
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists; 1/1/2000; Thakur, Ramesh; 711 words
; ... diffuse and uncertain post-Cold War threats by retaining its ultimate trump card, the nuclear stockpile. THERE HAS BEEN GOOD NEWS, OF COURSE. BY PURSUING a degree of genuine nuclear disarmament beginning in the late 1980s, the United States and Russia reversed ...
Read more
|
|
The dilemma of nuclear weapons in the twenty-first century
Naval War College Review; 4/1/2001; Turner, Stansfield; 4371 words
; For over thirty years the United States, Russia, and others have been attempting to limit, control, and reduce the nuclear weapons in the world. These efforts have resulted in a number of bilateral and multilateral treaties, and the number of these weapons has been reduced markedly. As a result, we
Read more
|
|
Apocalypse soon: Robert McNamara is worried. He knows how close we've come. His counsel helped the Kennedy administration avert nuclear catastrophe during the Cuban Missile Crisis. Today, he believes the United States must no longer rely on nuclear weapons as a foreign--policy tool. To do so is immoral, illegal, and dreadfully dangerous.(Cover Story)
Foreign Policy; 5/1/2005; McNamara, Robert S.; 3893 words
; It is time--well past time, in my view--for the United States to cease its Cold War-style reliance on nuclear weapons as a foreign-policy tool. At the risk of appearing simplistic and provocative, I would characterize current U.S. nuclear weapons policy as immoral, illegal, militarily unnecessary,
Read more
|
|
Nuclear disarmament: the NAS blueprint.(National Academy of Sciences report, 'The Future of U.S. Nuclear Weapons Policy')
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists; 9/1/1997; Moore, Mike; 2178 words
; A recent report by a standing committee of the National Academy of Sciences challenges the United States to rethink its Cold War-era nuclear weapons policies and seriously consider the goal of nuclear disarmament. Specifically, the United States should: * Begin work on Start III immediately rather
Read more
|
|
Let the United States first cast out the beam from its own eye. (U.S. nuclear weapons impose greater risks on the international community than those of India and Pakistan)
The Humanist; 7/1/1998; Larrabee, J. Whitfield; 869 words
; In the fury of condemning India and Pakistan for their recent nuclear tests, the media has largely ignored the more pervasive and dangerous conduct of the United States and Russia. While India and Pakistan possess, at most, a handful of nuclear weapons and no long-range intercontinental ballistic
Read more
|
|
PERMANENT REPRESENTATIVE OF THE UNITED STATES CHRISTINA ROCCA PERMANENT REPRESENTATIVE OF THE UNITED STATES CHRISTINA ROCCA DELIVERS REMARKS AT THE CONFERENCE ON DISARMAMENT
Washington Transcript Service; 10/9/2007; 3491 words
; Washington Transcript Service 10-09-2007 PERMANENT REPRESENTATIVE ROCCA DELIVERS REMARKS AT THE CONFERENCE ON DISARMAMENT, GENEVA, SWITZERLAND, AS PREPARED FOR DELIVERY, AS RELEASED BY THE STATE DEPARTMENT OCTOBER 9, 2007 SPEAKER: PERMANENT REPRESENTATIVE OF THE UNITED STATES CHRISTINA ROCCA
Read more
|
|
U.S. nukes in the Gulf. (United States military policy and the Iraq-Kuwait crisis)
The Nation; 12/31/1990; Arkin, William M.; 2596 words
; ... to introduce the n word, using the threat of a nuclear-armed Iraq as another way to mobilize support for an offensive war. The news media have obliged with a rash of stories about Iraq's chemical arsenal, biological research programs, destructive fuel-air explosives ...
Read more
|
Related entries from encyclopedias, dictionaries, and thesauruses
|
Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament
A Dictionary of World History
Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND) A British pressure group pledged to nuclear disarmament and to the abandonment of British ... Greenham Common. In 1980 European Nuclear Disarmament (END) was formed, linking closely ...
Read more
|
|
nuclear disarmament
World Encyclopedia
nuclear disarmament See disarmament ; Strategic Arms Limitation Talks (SALT)
Read more
|
|
Arms Regulation and Disarmament
Worldmark Encyclopedia of Nations
... Measures and Disarmament in Europe; and ... South Pacific Nuclear Free Zone Treaty ... arms control and disarmament. The progress ... is the first disarmament agreement that ... Southeast Asia Nuclear Weapon Free Zone (SEAN WFZ ... nuclear-weapon-free zone or by ...
Read more
|
|
Arms Control and Disarmament
Encyclopedia of American Foreign Policy
... general and complete disarmament under strict and ... the banning of nuclear tests and several ... nuclear-weapons-free zones further ... Conference on Disarmament wrestle with the ... its approval. Nuclear-Weapons-Free Zones There is ... forerunner of nuclear-weapons-free ...
Read more
|
|
disarmament
World Encyclopedia
... In 1952, these merged to form the Disarmament Commission. It produced no results ... and the Soviet Union signed the Nuclear Test Ban Treaty (1963) and the Nuclear ... intensification of the Cold War froze all disarmament efforts. In 1986 START (strategic ... SALT, resulting in the Intermediate ...
Read more
|