Visit our new topic page about agricultural subsidies

agricultural subsidies

The Columbia Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition | Date: 2008

agricultural subsidies financial assistance to farmers through government-sponsored price-support programs. Beginning in the 1930s most industrialized countries developed agricultural price-support policies to reduce the volatility of prices for farm products and to increase, or at least stabilize, farm income. In food-exporting countries, such as the United States and France, agricultural subsidies have been designed primarily to increase farm income, either by raising the long-term level of prices above free-market levels or by providing direct payments to farmers. The sale of agricultural products to developing nations at below market prices has often had a devastating effect on the ability of farmers in those nations to prosper, and the continuation of such subsidies has become a stumbling block to efforts to dismantle international trade barriers.

U.S. Assistance Programs

In the United States, the federal government first assisted agriculture directly in the 1920s. During World War I farmers had been encouraged to increase production, and in the postwar period wartime levels of production were maintained. This resulted in an oversupply that caused a sharp drop in prices. The Agricultural Credits Act (1923) failed to solve the problem. In 1929, President Hoover signed the Agricultural Marketing Act, establishing the Federal Farm Board with a fund of $500 million to further farming cooperatives and to set up stabilization boards, which by their purchases on the open market were to stabilize the prices of grain and cotton. Such purchases, however, only encouraged farmers to raise still larger crops in expectation of greater profits; consequently, the Farm Board failed and had to sell its holdings at a loss of $200 million.

The Agricultural Adjustment Act (AAA) of 1933, one of the first pieces of legislation passed under President Franklin Delano Roosevelt's New Deal program, attempted to control farm prices by reducing and controlling the supply of basic crops. The AAA empowered the Secretary of Agriculture to fix marketing quotas for major farm products, to take surplus production off the market, and to reduce production of staple crops by offering producers payments in return for voluntarily reducing the acreage devoted to raising such crops. The Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC), also created in 1933, began making loans to farmers on agricultural products. Loans were granted only to farmers who agreed to sign production-control agreements. Farm prices steadily improved: between 1932 and 1937 the prices for major farm products increased by approximately 85%. However, the Supreme Court declared certain production control features of the AAA unconstitutional.

Large crops of wheat and cotton led to passage of the Agricultural Act of 1937. In its amended form, this act provided the framework for the major farm programs in effect since that time. The act made price-support loans by the CCC mandatory on the designated basic commodities of corn, wheat, and cotton; optional support was authorized for other commodities. Under this act and related legislation, the CCC has supported more than 100 different commodities, including fruit, vegetables, and various types of seed.

From 1941 to 1948, during and just after World War II, surpluses were rapidly utilized, and price supports were used as an incentive to stimulate production of agricultural commodities. In 1948 price-support levels were lowered for most of those commodities. By 1949 the agriculture of war-devastated Europe and Asia had recovered to a significant extent, and demand for American farm products declined considerably. At the same time, however, crop production in the United States had greatly increased, with the result that farm commodity prices dropped and surpluses began to build up again. Rigid support levels were once again enacted, but the Korean War strengthened farm prices and most CCC stocks were sold. Mounting surpluses and increased costs of government programs led to the enactment of a flexible price support program (1954) and of the Soil Bank program (1956), which provided for direct payments to farmers in return for reducing their acreage of major supported crops and required that they leave fallow the land removed from production. The desired effect of control programs was largely negated, because improved technology made it possible to greatly increase yields per acre.

In the early 1960s price supports on major commodities were dropped to or near market-clearing prices, and producers' incomes were protected by direct payments on fixed quantities of products. Direct payments to farmers greatly increased after the 1960s, the feed grain, cotton, and wheat programs accounting for most of this increase.

Attempts at Ending Subsidies

Once introduced, subsidies to maintain prices have proved extremely difficult to end. In France, farmers have vigorously protested decreases in subsidies that have made them the second largest food exporter after the United States. In 1996, the U.S. Congress, despite its long history of farm price supports, passed the Freedom to Farm Act, which eliminated agricultural subsidies in favor of fixed payments to farmers. The legislation failed to decrease payments to farmers, however, and by 2000 aid to farmers (including so-called emergency payments) had reached more than $22 billion, three times the 1996 level. A new federal farm bill in 2002 abandoned the 1996 goal of reducing farm payments, increasing base program expenditures by 80%. Agricultural subsidies in the United States, the European Community (now the European Union; EU),and Japan were issues of contentious debate in the Uruguay (1986-94) round of international trade negotiations under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and remain so in the World Trade Organization (WTO). In 2005 the WTO issued rulings against U.S. cotton and EU sugar exports in which it said that subsidies distorted world trade.

Bibliography

See D. Goodman and M. Redclift, ed., The International Farm Crisis (1967); G. L. Cramer, Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness (1979); C. Peter Timmer, Getting Prices Right: The Scope and Limits of Agricultural Price Policy (1986); W. P. Browne, Private Interests, Public Policy, and American Agriculture (1989).

Author not available, AGRICULTURAL SUBSIDIES., The Columbia Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition 2008



The Columbia Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition. Copyright 2008 Columbia University Press

Related newspaper, magazine, and journal articles from HighBeam Research

International Trade: Pushing United States Agriculture Toward a Greener Future?
Georgetown International Environmental Law Review; 1/1/2005; Person, Stacey Willemsen; 9345 words ; I. INTRODUCTION Farming is an enormous industry in the United States, as evidenced by the approximately U.S. $200 billion worth of agricultural products sold by U.S. farms in 2002.1 Nearly thirty percent of all agricultural production is exported, and those exports have a value of U.S. $60 billion Read more
United States' narco-terrorism policy: a contingency approach to the convergence of the wars on drugs and against terrorism.
The Review of Policy Research; 7/1/2005; Dolan, Chris J.; 11314 words ; ... teachers, online information, community and news media outreach--to raise awareness about ... February 16). The terror-heroin nexus. U.S. News and World Report, p. 12. Rashid, A. (1999 ... Afghan farmers die in poppy protest. BBC News. Retrieved May 2, 2004, from http://news ... Read more
END SUBSIDIES, EXPAND TRADE THE UNITED STATES SHOULD LEAD THE WORLD TOWARD A FREER AGRICULTURAL MARKETPLACE.(OPINION)(GUEST COLUMN)(Column)
Wisconsin State Journal (Madison, WI); 7/30/2004; 497 words ; Wisconsin farmers have far more to gain than to lose by giving up their subsidies. That's why Wisconsin should urge U.S. negotiators to lead the World Trade Organization to agreement on guidelines to phase out export subsidies. As the Wisconsin State Journal reported earlier this week, farmers in Read more
Building a transatlantic biotech partnership: the United States and Europe must act together--and now--to avoid deeper confrontation over biotechnology and to protect shared economic interests.
Issues in Science and Technology; 9/22/2004; Purvis, Nigel; 5473 words ; The United States and Europe continue to turn up the heat in their long-simmering biotech stew. In May 2003, the Bush administration initiated a challenge within the World Trade Organization (WTO) to Europe's five-year de facto moratorium on approving new genetically modified (GM) seeds for Read more
Harvest season also yields danger for farmers; Farming ranks as the 2nd most dangerous occupation in the United States
Telegraph - Herald (Dubuque); 9/25/2003; JOHN EVERLY; 348 words ; Harvest season has arrived and it brings farmers the rewards of nearly a year's worth of preparation and care. It also brings long, sometimes hectic hours in the field, where fatigue and stress take their toll and frequently compromise safety. "There are a lot of times we take things from the Read more
FARM SUBSIDY COSTS OUTWEIGH BENEFITS THE UNITED STATES SHOULD REDUCE FARM SUBSIDIES, INCLUDING THE PROGRAM THAT SUPPORTS WISCONSIN DAIRY FARMERS.(OPINION)(Editorial)
Wisconsin State Journal (Madison, WI); 4/29/2004; 424 words ; Congress and the Bush administration should read the World Trade Organization's ruling against U.S. cotton subsidies as a warning that all farm subsidies should be curbed, including the program that supports Wisconsin dairy farmers. Subsidies have merit in limited circumstances. But when large Read more
Book review essay: Americans and Canadians: ongoing arguments over differences and similarities.(Regions Apart: The Four Societies of Canada and the United States)(Book review)
American Review of Canadian Studies; 6/22/2006; Morrison, Katherine; 3262 words ; Edward Grabb and James Curtis. Regions Apart: The Four Societies of Canada and the United States. Toronto: Oxford University Press, 2005. xiv + 319 pp. $45.00 paper. Books that stress differences between Canada and the United States are popular in Canada. Many Canadians have been taken for Read more
Sudan and the United States: is a decade of tension winding down? (Ronen: Sudan and the United States).
Middle East Policy; 3/1/2002; Ronen, Yehudit; 7966 words ; ... with al-Hayat, June 11, 1993; Sudanese News Agency (SUNA; Khartoum), August 27, 1993 ... statement by Turabi, Islamic Revolution News Agency (IRNA; Tehran), December 3, 1994 ... SUNA, Febraury 2, 1996 (DR). (34) Sudan: News and Views (electronic version), No. 19 ... Read more
The Core of the Global Economy - The combined U.S.--EU gross domestic product is $18 trillion, dwarfing all other economic relationships in the world.(United States- European Union trade relationship)(Column)(Statistical Data Included)
World and I; 4/1/2001; SMYSER, WILLIAM RICHARD; 1826 words ; The European Union and the United States form the core of the global economy. America has the world's largest single GDP, about $9.5 trillion. The 15 states of the European Union jointly have the next largest, $8.5 trillion, and will have a larger one when all the prospective new members join by Read more
NAFTA 2002: A cost/benefit analysis for the United States, Canada, and Mexico.(North American Free Trade Area )(Statistical Data Included)
Canadian-American Public Policy; 1/1/2002; Fry, Earl H. Bybee, Jared; 11425 words ; I. INTRODUCTION With the establishment or the North American Free Trade Area (NAFTA) in 1994, the United States, Canada, and Mexico have created the world's largest free trade zone involving over 400 million people and 11 trillion dollars in annual production. In addition, three-way trade in goods Read more

Related entries from encyclopedias, dictionaries, and thesauruses

subsidy
The Columbia Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition ... beneficial to the public welfare. Subsidies were used in England in the later ... royal prerogative; such early subsidies later became the means by which ... varied usage in the 20th cent. Subsidies may be granted to keep prices ... Corporation (Amtrak) receives federal subsidies for its intercity ... Read more
SIC 9641 Regulation of Agricultural Marketing and Commodities
Encyclopedia of American Industries ... marketing, and consumer services. NAICS Code(s) 926140 (Regulation of Agricultural Marketing and Commodities) Government establishments primarily engaged ... programs for developing economic data about agriculture and trade in agricultural products are classified in SIC 9611: Administration of General ... Read more
SIC 0191 General Farms, Primarily Crop
Encyclopedia of American Industries ... government supports, subsidies, and planning. This ... heavily on governmental subsidies. In 1999 the U.S ... economic challenges, the agricultural industry found itself ... supplies came from agricultural run-off. An estimated ... were attributed to agricultural runoff. In addition ... favored ... Read more
SIC 0111 Wheat
Encyclopedia of American Industries ... industry has followed the general agricultural movement of consolidation and ... government involvement in the agricultural sector as a whole, and wheat ... by gradually reducing farm subsidies over a seven-year period set ... States' commitment to reduce agricultural subsidies during the last ... Read more
Denmark
Worldmark Encyclopedia of the Nations ... allowances, and rent subsidies. Under a new tax ... consistent advocate of free and fair conditions ... joining the European Free Trade Association ... only represents a free trade area but ... countries are duty-free. Duty rates for ... given a 0% rate. Agricultural products are ... Read more

Related research topics

Online videos

Food crisis and agricultural subsidies.