|
Search over 100 encyclopedias and dictionaries: |
Research categories | Follow us on Twitter |
Research categories
View all topics in the newsView all reference sources at Encyclopedia.com |
|||
|
|
Near v. Minnesota 1931
|
Appellant: J.M. Near
Appellee: State of Minnesota, ex rel. Floyd B. Olson, County Attorney of Hennepin County
Appellant's Claim: That a state "gag law" preventing publication of his newspaper violated the First Amendment freedom of the press.
Chief Lawyers for Appellant: Weymouth Kirkland and T.E. Latimer
Chief Lawyers for Appellee: James E. Markham and Arthur L. Markve
Justices for the Court: Louis D. Brandeis, Oliver Wendell Holmes, Charles Evans Hughes (writing for the Court), Owen Josephus Roberts, Harlan Fiske Stone
Justices Dissenting: Pierce Butler, James Clark McReynolds, George Sutherland, Willis Van Devanter
Date of Decision: June 1, 1931
Decision: The law violated the freedom of the press.
Significance: This was the first time the Supreme Court declared that "prior restraints" on publication violated the First Amendment.
In 1925, Minnesota passed a law called the Minnesota Gag Law. The law allowed judges to stop the publication of any newspaper that created a scandal or defamed (lied about) a person. The law was designed to …
Read the rest of this article, courtesy of your local library
Find more facts and information related to the article Near v. Minnesota 1931