rating

Home > Social Sciences and the Law > Political Science and Government > Military Affairs (nonnaval)

rating. For a seaman's rank see rate (2). Otherwise, it is a calculation of a yacht's expected performance relative to another yacht during a race, based on the physical measurements, and other definable characteristics, of the yacht. Two early methods in Britain of physical measuring were the Builders Old Measurement and Thames Measurement, but a common variant nowadays is performance handicap where observed performance, rather than physical measurement, is the determining factor. These rules are best suited to local racing because of the difficulty of assessing comparative performance across wide areas. In North America by far the most popular rule of this type is the well-established Performance Handicap Racing Fleet (PHRF). This has been in use for many years and a version of it is used in other countries around the world. The Portsmouth Yardstick is the British equivalent. With this, the results of handicap racing are sent by clubs to the Royal Yachting Association, which calculates a national figure for each class of boat. The result is a Portsmouth number and the corrected time (CT) is obtained with the formula CT = (Elapsed Time × 1000)/Portsmouth number.

However, the most widely used rating rules are still based on measurement, the principle underlying them being that a yacht's ultimate speed is related to her length. This speed is only reached in stronger winds, and the amount of sail area that a yacht carries, and also her displacement, will affect her performance. Most rules therefore specify a measurement of length, which is usually some combination of the waterline length and the bow and stern overhangs, if any.

There are also rules for the measurement of sail areas in the different parts of the rig. The displacement of the yacht will be included in some form, either by weighing or by full measurement of the hull shape and then flotation depth. Corrections are also included for items such as beam, draught, freeboard, engines and propellers, centreboards, and keels, all of which have some effect on a yacht's performance. Some measurement of stability or ballast ratio is also necessary.

The most common methods for combining these individual measurements to produce rating are either formula rules, where a series of linked formulae combine to produce the rating, or velocity prediction programme (VPP) rules. In the latter the performance of the yacht is mathematically predicted under a range of conditions using a computer program, and the rating derived from the outcome. Historically, ratings were expressed in linear units of feet or metres with race organizers then applying time allowances to them. More recently, ratings have been directly expressed as time allowances.

There have been many rating rules since yachting became a popular sport and yacht designers have always been ingenious in evading them. The earliest rating rules were intended to restrict the variations of proportions of yachts within classes that were to race without handicap. Examples of these rules were the rater classes of the late 19th century and the International Metre Classes where the actual rules differed in their values and limits in determining the various metre class yachts which raced from 1907. More properly, these variants on rating rules are known as ‘box’ rules because they simply impose dimensional restrictions and do not generally incorporate any form of time allowance. Some of these classes are, as classic yachts, still competing today, perhaps the best known being the 12-metre which was used in the America's Cup races from 1958–1987. In the USA the Universal Rule was used the same way to rate the various classes, including the J-class, until the International Rule which governed the metre classes was gradually adopted.

Between the two world wars the advent of ocean racing (see yachting: sail) required the use of rating rules under which cruising yachts of different types and sizes could race together with time allowances. The best known and most widely used were those devised by two yacht clubs, the Cruising Club of America and the Royal Ocean Racing Club (RORC). Both required a yacht to be measured manually by a measurer so its rating could be calculated. The two rules were brought together in 1970 to become the International Offshore Rating Rule (IOR), Mk. II. Mk. III was introduced in 1973, and in November 1975 Mk. IIIA was introduced to cover existing yachts that were not out-and-out racing machines. The IOR rule governed ocean racing internationally until it was gradually replaced in the 1980s. The last large regatta to use it exclusively was the One Ton Cup held at Marseille in 1994, by which time the Channel Handicap System (CHS) and the Measurement Handicap System (MHS), which became the International Measurement System (IMS) in 1985, were in the ascendancy.

Unlike IOR, which had become expensive and complicated, CHS was cheap and simple— boats did not need to be measured for it. Devised by the RORC and UNCL (Union Nationale de la Course au Large), the RORC's French equivalent, both clubs developed it and agreed to keep the formula secret to thwart designers trying to optimize it.

IMS, originally an American system, was introduced around the same time as CHS for high-level racing. IMS evolved from a system of measurement and computer prediction of speed developed in the 1970s by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). In the past, yachts had always had to be measured manually to produce the measurements required to rate them. The MIT system employs a VPP to assess the potential speed of a boat. The data is obtained by measuring the hull with an electronic wand which transmits it to a computer, defining the entire geometrical shape of the hull, keel, and rudder. From the hydrodynamics of this, and the aerodynamics of the rig, the VPP calculates the boat's potential speed in a variety of wind speeds and directions. Unlike other rating rules, IMS provides a yacht with different time allowances for the actual course sailed during a race and the strength of wind encountered.

IMS has never been adopted to the same extent worldwide as IOR. In 1999, the RORC and UNCL introduced IR2000, a two-level rating system. At the lower level IRC is a development of CHS and was recognized by the International Sailing Federation as an international rating system in 2003. It is now used extensively all around the world. IRM was intended as a high-level international rating rule but to date has only been adopted in British waters. In 2004, IRC and IRM were separated into two separate rules with the overall IR2000 name being dropped. Johnson, P. , Yacht Rating (1997).

rating, rating scales Rating scales require respondents to make a judgement of absolute value—as, for example, in the case of a university professor grading student assignments according to their scholarly excellence. Typically, in sociological research, respondents are asked, for example, to indicate the prestige of different occupations on a scale from (say) one to ten; or, similarly, to indicate how enthusiastic or unenthusiastic they are about a range of government policies, on a (perhaps five-point) scale ranging from ‘entirely support’ at one extreme, to ‘entirely oppose’ at the other (with intermediate ratings of ‘mildly support’, ‘disinterested’, and ‘mildly oppose’). See also LIKERT SCALE; RANKING.

rat·ing¹ / ˈrāting/ • n. a classification or ranking of someone or something based on a comparative assessment of their quality, standard, or performance: the hotel regained its five-star rating. ∎  (ratings) the estimated audience size of a particular television or radio program: the soap's ratings have recently picked up. ∎  the value of a property or condition that is claimed to be standard, optimal, or limiting for a substance, material, or item of equipment: fuel with a low octane rating. ∎  any of the classes into which racing yachts are assigned according to dimensions. rat·ing² • n. dated an angry reprimand.

rating na grouping of enlisted personnel based on military skills: his rating was Radioman, third class.

rating •matting • exacting •Banting, ranting •parting •enchanting, planting •everlasting, fasting, lasting •narrowcasting •letting, setting, wetting •self-respecting, self-selecting, unreflecting, unsuspecting •tempting •unconsenting, unrelenting •excepting •arresting, unprotesting, unresting, westing •bloodletting • trendsetting •pace-setting • typesetting •photosetting •grating, plating, rating, slating, uprating, weighting •painting •pasting, tasting •undeviating • self-perpetuating •unaccommodating • self-deprecating •suffocating • self-regulating •undiscriminating • underpainting •unhesitating •beating, fleeting, greeting, Keating, meeting, self-defeating, sweeting •easting •fitting, sitting, unbefitting, unremitting, witting •printing, unstinting •listing, twisting, unresisting •shopfitting • marketing •telemarketing • pickpocketing •weightlifting • side-splitting •carpeting • trumpeting •uninteresting • visiting •backlighting, lighting, self-righting, sighting, unexciting, uninviting, whiting, writing •infighting • prizefighting •dogfighting • bullfighting •handwriting • screenwriting •scriptwriting • copywriting •skywriting • signwriting •typewriting • songwriting • knotting •prompting •costing, frosting •self-supporting, unsporting •malting, salting •ripsnorting • outing •accounting, mounting •coating •Boulting, revolting •posting, roasting •billposting • disappointing •shooting, suiting, Tooting •sharpshooting • footing •off-putting •cutting, Nutting •bunting •disgusting, self-adjusting, trusting •blockbusting • linocutting •woodcutting • disquieting •disconcerting, shirting, skirting