United States v. Reese

Reese, United States v.

Reese, United States v., 92 U.S. 214 (1876), argued 13–14 Jan. 1875, decided 27 Mar. 1876 by vote of 8 to 1; Waite for the Court, Clifford concurring, Hunt in dissent. This was the Supreme Court's first voting rights case under the Fifteenth Amendment and the Enforcement Act of 1870. A Kentucky electoral official had refused to register an African‐American's vote in a municipal election and was indicted under two sections of the 1870 act: section 2 required that administrative preliminaries to elections be conducted without regard to race, color, or previous condition of servitude; section 3 forbade wrongful refusal to register votes where a prerequisite step “required as aforesaid” had been omitted. The Court held that the Fifteenth Amendment did not confer the right of suffrage but prohibited exclusion on racial grounds. The justices invalidated the operative section 3 since it did not repeat the words about race, color, and servitude and thus exceeded the scope of the Fifteenth Amendment.

In this case involving local elections the Court, dominated by Lincoln and Grant Republicans, chose not to set an expansive, national stamp on the Constitution. Though the Court was willing to uphold the Enforcement Acts in cases involving federal elections, its cramped, technical treatment of state and local cases crippled the acts for practical purposes. This left southern states free to disfranchise African‐Americans during the 1890s with literacy, character, and other tests that, while not based on race, were disproportionately exclusive of African‐Americans.

See also Grandfather Clause; Poll Taxes; Race and Racism; Reconstruction; Understanding Tests; Vote, Right to.

Ward E. Y. Elliott

Show all research tools

Cite this article
Pick a style below, and copy the text for your bibliography.

  • MLA
  • Chicago
  • APA

KERMIT L. HALL. "Reese, United States v." The Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States. 2005. Encyclopedia.com. 28 May. 2012 <http://www.encyclopedia.com>.

KERMIT L. HALL. "Reese, United States v." The Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States. 2005. Encyclopedia.com. (May 28, 2012). http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1O184-ReeseUnitedStatesv.html

KERMIT L. HALL. "Reese, United States v." The Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States. 2005. Retrieved May 28, 2012 from Encyclopedia.com: http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1O184-ReeseUnitedStatesv.html

Learn more about citation styles

United States v. Reese

UNITED STATES V. REESE

UNITED STATES V. REESE, 92 U.S. 214 (1876), was the first significant voting rights case decided by the U.S. Supreme Court under the Fifteenth Amendment. The Court struck down the Enforcement Act of 1870 because one of its sections permitted federal prosecution for refusal to accept votes without limiting the offense to denials based on race or prior condition of slavery. "The Fifteenth Amendment does not confer the right of suffrage upon any one," Chief Justice Morrison R. Waite stated. Reese enabled the southern states to deny the vote to blacks on seemingly nonracial grounds, such as literacy, and thus was the foundation for later black disfranchisement.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Gillette, William. Retreat from Reconstruction, 1869–1879. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1979.

Stephenson, D. Grier. "The Supreme Court, the Franchise, and the Fifteenth Amendment: The First Sixty Years." University of Missouri Kansas City Law Review 57 (1988): 47–65.

William M.Wiecek

See alsoForce Acts ; Voter Registration .

Show all research tools

Cite this article
Pick a style below, and copy the text for your bibliography.

  • MLA
  • Chicago
  • APA

"United States v. Reese." Dictionary of American History. 2003. Encyclopedia.com. 28 May. 2012 <http://www.encyclopedia.com>.

"United States v. Reese." Dictionary of American History. 2003. Encyclopedia.com. (May 28, 2012). http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G2-3401804347.html

"United States v. Reese." Dictionary of American History. 2003. Retrieved May 28, 2012 from Encyclopedia.com: http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G2-3401804347.html

Learn more about citation styles

Free newspaper and magazine articles

The growing admissibility of expert testimony by clinical social workers on...
Magazine article from: Social Work; 4/1/2008
Special Report: The Duty to Warn Third Parties in Emergency Medicine.
Newspaper article from: ED Legal Letter; 11/1/2009
International bounty hunter ride-along: should U.K. thrill seekers be...
Magazine article from: Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law; 5/1/2002

Pictures from Google Image Search

Click to see an enlarged picture
Click to see an enlarged picture
Click to see an enlarged picture

See more pictures of United States v. Reese