Truman, Harry S (1884–1972)was president of the USA, 1945–52.On 12 April 1945, Roosevelt's death catapulted Truman, as incumbent vice-president, into the American presidency. Millions in the country worried that ‘the little man from Missouri’, as he was initially described, would not be an effective replacement for Roosevelt, one of the greatest presidents in US history. Truman, however, had attributes that would allow him to rise to the challenge. A captain of artillery in the
First World War, a Missouri county judge, and, from 1935, a senator, he had almost ten years of experience in the Senate when Roosevelt selected him as his vice-presidential running mate in 1944. Despite ties to the corrupt Democratic machine in Kansas City, Missouri, Truman had a reputation as an honest, hard-working, loyal Democrat. He gained national prominence during the Second World War as chairman of the Senate Special Committee to Investigate the National Defense Program. Credited with saving the government billions of dollars and protecting the Roosevelt administration from criticism over war production, the Truman Committee, as it was called, gave him standing with Roosevelt. More important, a split in the Democratic Party, between southern conservatives opposed to the incumbent liberal vice-president, Henry Wallace, and liberal labour leaders opposed to the leading conservative candidate,
James Byrnes of South Carolina, made Truman, a border state Democrat and moderate, the compromise choice for the job.
During his 83 days as vice-president, the 60-year-old Truman had little contact with Roosevelt and no clear idea of what his chief intended in foreign affairs. The president, for example, had never informed him of the programme to build an
atomic bomb nor taken him into his confidence on any of the great post-war issues the country would shortly confront. On assuming the presidency, Truman relied on Roosevelt's advisers and his own instincts to fashion a response to events in Europe, where the war ended on 8 May. To reassure Americans and the country's allies that there would be no break with Roosevelt's policies, Truman announced in his first speech on 16 April that he would insist on
unconditional surrender by Germany and Japan.
By the time Truman had become president, Germany's defeat was assured and the emerging problem in Europe was Soviet expansionism. Aggressively asserting their self-interest in eastern Europe generally and in Poland in particular, the Soviets angered Truman, who accused them of breaking the Yalta agreements made with Roosevelt in February 1945 (see
ARGONAUT). Truman believed that Soviet treatment of Poland signalled whether the world would enter a new era of collective security in international relations or a return to traditional Great Power politics. In meetings with the Soviet foreign minister,
Molotov, on 22– 23 April, the president, believing it would save American lives, echoed Roosevelt's hopes for Soviet participation in the war against Japan while emphasizing that good relations with the USA depended on Moscow's fulfilment of the Yalta accords.
Truman took some hope for continued co-operation with the Soviets from the successful
San Francisco conference in April and May, which established the United Nations. He took particular satisfaction from Stalin's acceptance of American insistence on limiting vetoes in the Security Council to matters of substance. No nation would have a veto over agenda items for debate, assuring freedom of discussion on all international questions. He also took comfort from the thought that the likely development of an atomic bomb would give the USA the power to shape the course of post-war affairs. His decision to go ahead with the production of the bomb, however, rested principally on the expectation that it would serve to end the war more quickly against Japan (but see
atomic bomb, 2).
Soviet reaffirmation in June of a readiness to fight Japan and acceptance of Truman's suggestion that there be a Big Three meeting (see also
Grand Alliance) in July further encouraged the president's hopes for post-war co-operation with Moscow. As a consequence, Truman rejected suggestions from Churchill that US troops, who ended the war deep inside the previously determined Soviet zone of occupation, be left there as a way to put pressure on Moscow regarding eastern Europe. Truman believed that this would do more to undermine than advance Soviet–American relations and might delay the movement of US forces from Europe to the Far East.
Truman's conference with Churchill and Stalin at Potsdam from 17 July to 3 August (see
TERMINAL) jolted the president's hopes for sustained Allied co-operation. Towards the end of July, elections in the UK replaced Churchill with
Attlee, leader of the Labour Party, and raised questions in Truman's mind about continuities in British foreign policy. More important, the conference produced sharp quarrels with Stalin over a number of issues, including western recognition of Moscow's East European satellites, Poland's western boundary with Germany (see
Oder–Neisse Line), and German reparation payments. Although agreements were hammered out on some of these issues, and Truman put the best possible face on the discussions in a report to the American people, he had few illusions about the results of the meetings. Agreements with Moscow were more the exception than the rule, and the Big Three papered over their differences by referring them to a council of foreign ministers for further discussion.
Truman's face-to-face encounter with Stalin and the Soviets convinced him that the essential ingredient of relations with them must be toughness. News of the successful test of an atomic bomb in the New Mexico desert on 16 July stiffened his resolve to follow a hard line. When he received a cable about the test, Secretary of War
Henry Stimson remembered that ‘the president was tremendously pepped up by it.’ Churchill saw Truman as ‘emphatic and decisive…telling [the Soviets] as to certain demands that they absolutely could not have.’ Partly out of a desire to avoid future recriminations with the Soviets over hiding the development of the bomb, Truman now decided to inform them of its existence. At the close of the day's proceedings on 24 July, he casually told Stalin that the USA had a weapon of unusually destructive force that it planned to use against the Japanese to end the war. Stalin, who already had knowledge of America's atomic project from
spies, coolly expressed pleasure at the news and the hope that the Americans would make good use of the weapon against Japan. Three days before the end of the conference Truman wrote to his mother, ‘You never saw such pig-headed people as are the Russians. I hope I never have to hold another conference with them—but, of course, I will.’ In fact, he never did.
A constant concern Truman faced during and after Potsdam was how to end the war against Japan quickly but without sacrificing American determination for an unconditional surrender. Suggestions to Truman and his secretary of state James Byrnes that they issue a call for Japan's surrender while promising not to abolish the monarchy were rejected. The president believed that Japan might take such a statement as a sign of weakness and might lead to terrible repercussions in the USA. Although the Japanese asked the Soviets to explore the possibility of mediation, and Stalin passed the request to Truman at Potsdam, the president was unresponsive. He believed it was a ploy to divide the Allies and weaken their will to fight. Moreover, deciphered cables (see
MAGIC) from Tokyo to the Japanese ambassador in Moscow, saying that Japan would not accept unconditional surrender, persuaded the president that Japan intended to hold on to some conquered territory. On 27 July, the UK, USA, and China issued an ultimatum to Japan to proclaim unconditional surrender or face ‘prompt and utter destruction’. Nothing was said about the future of the monarchy. Tokyo dismissed the ultimatum as a rehash of past declarations.
The Japanese response triggered final preparations for using atomic bombs against Japan at
Hiroshima on 6 August and
Nagasaki on 9 August. Much has been written about Truman's fateful decision to drop the bomb. In a sense there never was a decision. As General Leslie R. Groves, the army officer in charge of the bomb's development, said, Truman's ‘decision was one of noninterference—basically a decision not to upset the existing plan.’ All the momentum was in the direction of using the bomb. Having invested $2 billion in its development, fearful that the alternative was a longer war with hundreds of thousands of additional Allied casualties, and hardened by repeated Axis and Allied air raids, which had already taken hundreds of thousands of civilian lives, Truman and his military chiefs saw no compelling reason against the earliest possible use of the bomb. Considerations of power politics—the extent to which use of the ‘winning weapon’, as some called it, would increase the USA's ability to compel Soviet compliance with post-war peace arrangements—were distinctly secondary; but they were not entirely absent from Truman's mind.
Soviet entry into the war against Japan on 8 August and Japanese acceptance of US surrender terms, which Tokyo interpreted as not eliminating the emperor's rule, brought an end to the war on 14 August. Although Truman understood that the future peace might hold difficulties as great as any he had faced in ending the war, he took satisfaction from having presided over a rapid conclusion to the most terrible war in human history.
Robert Dallek
Bibliography
Donovan, R. J. , Conflict and Crisis: The Presidency of Harry S. Truman, 1945–1948 (New York, 1977).
Gaddis, J. L. , The United States and the Origins of the Cold War, 1941–1947 (New York, 1972).
Sherwin, M. J. , A World Destroyed: The Atomic Bomb in the Grand Alliance, 1941–1945 (New York, 1975).