|
Search over 100 encyclopedias and dictionaries: |
Research categories | Follow us on Twitter |
Research categories
View all topics in the newsView all reference sources at Encyclopedia.com |
|||
Animals
16. AnimalsSee also 45. BIRDS ; 61. BULLS and BULLFIGHTING ; 70. CATS ; 88. COCKS ; 125. DOGS ; 164. FISH ; 211. HORSES ; 225. INSECTS ; 353. REPTILES ; 374. SNAKES ; 423. WOLVES ; 427. WORMS ; 430. ZOOLOGY
|
|
|
Cite this article
"Animals." -Ologies and -Isms. 1986. Encyclopedia.com. 27 May. 2012 <http://www.encyclopedia.com>. "Animals." -Ologies and -Isms. 1986. Encyclopedia.com. (May 27, 2012). http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G2-2505200027.html "Animals." -Ologies and -Isms. 1986. Retrieved May 27, 2012 from Encyclopedia.com: http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G2-2505200027.html |
|
animals
animals were employed by every combatant country for a variety of tasks, including transporting supplies (see logistics), hauling artillery, finding mines, and as mascots.
General Slim listed carrier pigeons, dogs, ponies, mules, horses, bullocks, buffaloes, and elephants as all being used by his Fourteenth Army in the Burma campaign. His elephant companies helped build hundreds of bridges as well as laying log causeways, launching ships, and transporting supplies. The Japanese used elephants to transport mortars and ammunition during their advance into Burma from Thailand in 1941 and they used a column of 350 of them during their Imphal offensive in March 1944. The British prized them highly and managed to capture more than 1,600 from the Japanese. During the North African campaign the British Royal Army Service Corps formed animal transport companies which each contained 308 load-carrying mules. As every mule could carry 72 kg. (160 lb.) this gave each company the ability to ‘lift’ about 22 tons. Mules were also used extensively during the Sicilian and Italian campaigns with the Fifth US Army employing fifteen Italian pack trains totalling nearly 4,000 mules in the Apennines during the last winter of the war. In Italy the French Expeditionary Corps, whose North African Goums were skilled in mountain warfare, were almost entirely reliant on them for their logistics. But, as in the First World War, the horse was the most commonly used animal in combat. Cavalry was more widely employed than might be supposed and two American generals, Patton and Truscott, were convinced that if they had had a cavalry division during the Sicilian campaign they could have prevented Axis forces from escaping across the Straits of Messina. The French and the Poles used cavalry units during the first months of the war, as did the British. The last cavalry charge of the war probably took place in November 1941, when the Red Army's 44th Mongolian Cavalry Division was wiped out near the village of Musino by a German infantry division during the German–Soviet war, but the Red Army, as well as the Germans (see Soviet exiles at war) and Japanese, continued to use cavalry divisions throughout the war for patrolling and mopping-up operations. Horses were most commonly used for hauling guns and transport wagons, with the German Army relying on them the most. In 1939 a German infantry division required between 4,077 and 6,033 horses to move, and even panzer divisions used them. The Germans assembled 625,000 horses for the invasion of the USSR in June 1941 (see BARBAROSSA). Of these 180,000 were lost during the first winter. The casualty rates for horses on the Eastern Front were staggeringly high, with the USSR, which also used horses extensively until Lend-Lease trucks became available, losing two-thirds of its 21 million horses. Dogs were used for patrol and guard duties—one was reportedly parachuted on operations mounted by the Special Air Service—and in the Pacific war scout dogs were trained to detect Japanese troops at 27 m. (30 yd.) in all conditions and sometimes as far away as 275 m. (300 yd.). The UK and USSR also trained dogs to detect mines, engineers using them throughout the Normandy campaign of June– August 1944, and later in the Netherlands. One Soviet mine dog, called Zucha, apparently found 2,000 mines in 18 days. The Red Army also used dogs to destroy German tanks by training them to crawl under them. An explosive charge with a trigger device was strapped to the animal's back and when the trigger device touched the tank's underside it detonated the 11.8 kg. (26 lb.) charge. During the Stalingrad and Kursk battles 25 tanks were destroyed by dogs, but the method proved a double-edged weapon as the animals, having been trained with Soviet tanks, were more inclined to crawl under them than under German ones. An astonishing variety of animals was kept by many members of the armed forces of the combatant nations as pets and mascots, but perhaps the most unusual was Wojtek, a brown bear cub acquired by soldiers of Anders' Army in Persia. Wojtek saw action during the battle for Monte Cassino with the 22nd Transport Company of the Polish Army Service Corps when he helped move ammunition boxes. After the war he was given to Edinburgh zoo and lived to the age of 22. Bibliography Cooper, J. , Animals in War (London, 1983). |
|
|
Cite this article
I. C. B. DEAR and M. R. D. FOOT. "animals." The Oxford Companion to World War II. 2001. Encyclopedia.com. 27 May. 2012 <http://www.encyclopedia.com>. I. C. B. DEAR and M. R. D. FOOT. "animals." The Oxford Companion to World War II. 2001. Encyclopedia.com. (May 27, 2012). http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1O129-animals.html I. C. B. DEAR and M. R. D. FOOT. "animals." The Oxford Companion to World War II. 2001. Retrieved May 27, 2012 from Encyclopedia.com: http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1O129-animals.html |
|
Animals
Animals. The resemblances between many animals and humans, not least in their dependence on food and air, has given to animals a special status in all religions. Thus it has been widely believed that suprahuman realities, not least divine and diabolic, can take on the form of animals. They can also epitomize, in the form of totems, the networks of relationship which constitute a human society. Bearing, as they do, the obvious signs of vitality, animals have been a major part of sacrifice, becoming instrumental in expressing the many needs which humans have felt in their relation to God and to each other. Some religions (e.g. Islam) have retained animal sacrifice (ʿId al-Aḍḥā), but others have reacted strongly against the efficacy of such acts (e.g. Buddhism and Jainism). However, even in religions where the sacrifice of animals has taken, or does take, place, animals may be given a high and revered status. Judaism and Islam emphasize that they come from the hand of the Creator, and while they are to some extent given to humans for their use and food (e.g. Qurʾān 16. 5–8), this is within limits, and must always be in the context of kindness. Among Hindus, there is a controlling sense that that which alone is truly real (whether conceived of as Brahman or as God) underlies and guarantees the subsistence of all appearance: ‘This form is the source and indestructible seed of innumerable incarnations within the cosmos, and from it the appearances of all different living beings are created, heavenly beings, animals, humans, and all other kinds.… Thus you should regard deer, camels, monkeys, donkeys, rats, reptiles, birds and flies as though they are your own children’ (Śrimad-Bhagavatam). This underlying attitude is epitomized in the sacred cow (go). Not surprisingly, animals can be the focus of worship and in particular can be the forms of incarnation (avatāra). The principle of ahiṃsā, emphasized and reinforced among Jains and Buddhists, led to a strong preference for vegetarianism (for this issue in general, see FOOD). An attempt to mobilize the resources of religion for greater care of the environment and of animals within it was made in the Assisi meetings and declarations in 1986.
|
|
|
Cite this article
JOHN BOWKER. "Animals." The Concise Oxford Dictionary of World Religions. 1997. Encyclopedia.com. 27 May. 2012 <http://www.encyclopedia.com>. JOHN BOWKER. "Animals." The Concise Oxford Dictionary of World Religions. 1997. Encyclopedia.com. (May 27, 2012). http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1O101-Animals.html JOHN BOWKER. "Animals." The Concise Oxford Dictionary of World Religions. 1997. Retrieved May 27, 2012 from Encyclopedia.com: http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1O101-Animals.html |
|
animals
animals. From the time of the earliest Celtic traditions at Hallstatt and La Tène, certain animals had continuous associations in iconography and in storytelling. Shape-shifting gods and heroes transformed themselves into animals. In Celtic Christianity some saints, such as St Pol of Brittany, were thought to have power over the animals, while others, Sts Ailbe and Ciwa, were thought to be suckled by animals (wolves), as was Bairre, an ancestor of Amairgin. See BADGER; BEAR; BIRDS; BOAR; BULL; CAT; COCK; COW; DOG; OTTER; RAM; STAG; SWAN. The boar held a special place in Celtic iconography from earliest times, while the Continental Celts seem to have given most esteem to the horned, stag-like god Cernunnos. Anne Ross devotes a lengthy chapter to divine animals in early Celtic art in Pagan Celtic Britain (London, 1967), 297–353. See also BIRDS; FISH.
|
|
|
Cite this article
JAMES MacKILLOP. "animals." A Dictionary of Celtic Mythology. 2004. Encyclopedia.com. 27 May. 2012 <http://www.encyclopedia.com>. JAMES MacKILLOP. "animals." A Dictionary of Celtic Mythology. 2004. Encyclopedia.com. (May 27, 2012). http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1O70-animals.html JAMES MacKILLOP. "animals." A Dictionary of Celtic Mythology. 2004. Retrieved May 27, 2012 from Encyclopedia.com: http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1O70-animals.html |
|
animals
animals According to the Creation myth (Gen. 1: 28) humanity was given dominion over all sentient beings. This has often been accepted as divine authority for treating animals as property for food, religious sacrifices, and sport. Modern animal lovers in Western countries are inclined to reject this understanding of the text and respond with a moral generosity which believes that the rich and powerful have no absolute power but rather a duty to protect those parts of the Creation which are vulnerable and powerless. In the OT world wealth was measured by the size of herds (Job 1: 3) and religious zeal by sacrifices (Deut. 15: 21). In Christian worship animal sacrifices are abolished (Heb. 10: 4) by reason of Christ's perfect sacrifice.
|
|
|
Cite this article
W. R. F. BROWNING. "animals." A Dictionary of the Bible. 1997. Encyclopedia.com. 27 May. 2012 <http://www.encyclopedia.com>. W. R. F. BROWNING. "animals." A Dictionary of the Bible. 1997. Encyclopedia.com. (May 27, 2012). http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1O94-animals.html W. R. F. BROWNING. "animals." A Dictionary of the Bible. 1997. Retrieved May 27, 2012 from Encyclopedia.com: http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1O94-animals.html |
|
animals
animals. Because of its belief in rebirth, the Buddhist view of animals is more sympathetic than the traditional Western one. The fact that human and animal forms are seen as interchangeable leads to a greater feeling of kinship between them. For this reason, together with the ethical principle of ahiṃsā, many Buddhists are vegetarians (see diet). At the same time it is recognized that humans and animals are by no means equal. An animal rebirth is lower on the hierarchical scale (see six realms of rebirth) and to be reborn as an animal is seen as a great misfortune and due to the accumulation of bad karma.
|
|
|
Cite this article
DAMIEN KEOWN. "animals." A Dictionary of Buddhism. 2004. Encyclopedia.com. 27 May. 2012 <http://www.encyclopedia.com>. DAMIEN KEOWN. "animals." A Dictionary of Buddhism. 2004. Encyclopedia.com. (May 27, 2012). http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1O108-animals.html DAMIEN KEOWN. "animals." A Dictionary of Buddhism. 2004. Retrieved May 27, 2012 from Encyclopedia.com: http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1O108-animals.html |
|