household allocative system
household allocative system A term first coined by Jan Pahl, in a series of articles written in the 1980s, to describe the distribution of financial resources within households. The Pahl model provided a more sophisticated understanding of intra-household dynamics than had previously been attempted.
Five systems were identified for married couples, ranging from a ‘whole-wage system’ (where a single earner controls finances and dispenses a housekeeping allocation), to ‘independent management’ of separate incomes (with each partner taking responsibility for certain items of expenditure). ‘Pooling’ systems were either male–controlled or female-controlled–according to who managed and who had ultimate control over decisions on expenditure (see J. Pahl , Money and Marriage, 1989
).
Recently the concept has been criticized on several grounds. It is evident, for example, that there are substantial difficulties involved in assigning couples to a pre–defined categorization of systems. In addition it is highly probable that systems are more flexible over time than has been recognized from cross-sectional data. Moreover, the categorization refers only to couple households, and not to more extended households or to inter–household allocations. And, finally, the only resources considered are financial. More recent contributions have therefore been concerned with extending and refining the Pahl model, to encompass more flexible allocative arrangements, different types of household, and a wider range of goods, services, and responsibilities than the purely financial.
Five systems were identified for married couples, ranging from a ‘whole-wage system’ (where a single earner controls finances and dispenses a housekeeping allocation), to ‘independent management’ of separate incomes (with each partner taking responsibility for certain items of expenditure). ‘Pooling’ systems were either male–controlled or female-controlled–according to who managed and who had ultimate control over decisions on expenditure (see J. Pahl , Money and Marriage, 1989
).
Recently the concept has been criticized on several grounds. It is evident, for example, that there are substantial difficulties involved in assigning couples to a pre–defined categorization of systems. In addition it is highly probable that systems are more flexible over time than has been recognized from cross-sectional data. Moreover, the categorization refers only to couple households, and not to more extended households or to inter–household allocations. And, finally, the only resources considered are financial. More recent contributions have therefore been concerned with extending and refining the Pahl model, to encompass more flexible allocative arrangements, different types of household, and a wider range of goods, services, and responsibilities than the purely financial.
More From encyclopedia.com
Household , HOUSEHOLD. Definitions of what constitutes a household have always been dynamic and dependent on political, historical, and cultural factors. Prior t… Head Of Household , Head of Household
An individual in one family setting who provides actual support and maintenance to one or more individuals who are related to him o… Mrs Beeton , Beeton, Mrs (1836–65). Isabella Mary Beeton, née Mayson, was born in 1836 in London. Although her father died when she was 4, she received a rounded… Conjugal , role, conjugal
role, conjugal The distinctive roles of the husband and wife that result from the division of labour in the family. In her classic stu… Tigray , Tigray
PRONUNCIATION: TIH-gray
ALTERNATE NAMES: Tigre, Tigrai, or Tigrinya
LOCATION: Tigray state (Ethiopia), Eritrea
POPULATION: 4.3 million in Ethi… Household International Inc , Household International, Inc.
2700 Sanders Road
Prospect Heights, Illinois 60070
U.S.A.
(708) 564–3663
Public Company
Incorporated: 1925 as Household…
You Might Also Like
NEARBY TERMS
household allocative system