Equality as the virtue of sovereigns: A reply to Ronald Dworkin

From: Philosophy and Public Affairs | Date: April 1, 2003| Author: | Copyright information

In "Equality, Luck, and Hierarchy," Ronald Dworkin raises a number of objections to my article "What is Egalitarianism?"1 In this reply, I will respond briefly to his main objections.

I. IS DWORKIN A LUCK EGALITARIAN?

My article was not a review of Sovereign Virtue nor was it primarily a critique of Dworkin's theory. The article's primary topic was the position that Anderson has labeled "luck egalitarianism." I said at the outset of the article that there are many different versions of luck egalitarianism, but that they share a common core idea. The core idea is that inequalities deriving ...