The controversy over Title III of the Helms-Burton Act: Who is breaking international law--the United States, or the states that have made themselves co-conspirators with Cuba in its unlawful confiscations?

From: The George Washington Journal of International Law and Economics | Date: January 1, 1996| Author: Brice M Clagett | Copyright information

BRICE M. CLAGETT*

Enactment of the Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity Act (Helms-Burton Act or Act)' created a firestorm of controversy between the United States and many other nations, including its major trading partners.2 Title III of the legislation-as has become celebrated and, in some circles, notorious-creates a federal cause of action, on behalf of U.S. citizens whose property was confiscated without compensation by Cuba, against those who "traffic" in that property.3 Sev...

Related newspaper, magazine, and journal articles from HighBeam Research

[ The United States used AC-130s... ]
Chicago Sun-Times ; Caption only
Is the United States Bound by the Customary International Law of Torture? A Proposal for ATS Litigation in the War on Terror
Chicago Journal of International Law ; "Regardless of its substance, however, customary international law cannot bind the executive branch under the Constitution because it is not federal law."1 The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 were a seminal moment for the United States. This horrific act of murder and destruction inspired
GOLD RUSH FOR UNITED STATES
Chicago Sun-Times ; Caption only.
UNITED STATES
Sunday Star-Times ; Caption Text Only
England vs. United States
The Washington Post ; What: Quarterfinal. When: Tomorrow, 8 a.m., ESPN2.