|
Intelligent design has no place in science classes Science and religion ultimately share a common goal -- the search for truth
|
Gregor Mendel was a 19th century Augustinian monk whose studies of
garden peas established the foundation for today's burgeoning field
of genetics. Mendel, like many scientists, believed science could
only strengthen one's belief in God. After all, if God was the
creator, the created order was simply a reflection of His creative
genius.
Along the road to the 21st century, science discovered that many
things once thought to be solely in the domain of "supernatural" were
readily explain...
Related newspaper, magazine, and journal articles from HighBeam Research
|
|
Intelligent design is science -- really bad science: But critics must call it a 'religion' to keep it out of the classroom
Chicago Sun-Times
; Last week, a federal judge ruled that intelligent design may not be taught in the science classrooms of Pennsylvania's public schools. I agree with the verdict, but we need to be careful about our reasons for supporting it. Most critics of intelligent design seek to undermine it by arguing that the
|
|
What's wrong with intelligent design, and with its critics.(OPINION)
The Christian Science Monitor
; Byline: Alexander George AMHERST, MASS. -- This week, a federal judge ruled that intelligent design may not be taught in the science classrooms of Pennsylvania's public schools. I agree with the verdict, but we need to be careful about our reasons for supporting it. Most critics of intelligent
|
 "The Capital Times (Madison, WI)")
|
BELIEVE IT: INTELLIGENT DESIGN IS NOT SCIENCE.(EDITORIAL)(GUEST COLUMN)(Column)
The Capital Times (Madison, WI)
; Byline: P.J. SLINGER Last week President Bush said that the theory of intelligent design should be taught alongside the theory of evolution in high school science classes across America. Both sides ought to be properly taught so people can understand what the debate is about, the president said.
|
|
Intelligent design is a science, not a faith
China Daily
; "It is true that complex things in nature look as if they have been designed. Darwin knew this. But the sublime truth about his theory is that it explains how complex things can come about without design." That was the British journalist James Randerson arguing last month in the London-based
|
|
Prof explains his take on intelligent design at F&M
Intelligencer Journal Lancaster, PA
; ... trial that pitted Darwinian evolution against intelligent design. He wrote an article for the national magazine, Religion in the News, on his observations of the trial. Davis said Thursday there is "much confusion" over what intelligent design is relative to ...
|
