Whitney v. California

Whitney v. California, 274 U.S. 357 (1927), argued 18 Mar. 1926, decided 26 May 1927 by vote of 9 to 0; Sanford for the Court, Brandeis and Holmes concurring. In 1919 California passed a criminal syndicalism law designed to restrict the activities of the Industrial Workers of the World (IWW), a union long active in the state's agricultural fields and lumber camps. The statute prohibited advocacy of changes in the system of industrial ownership or political control.

The first significant prosecution under the law involved Charlotte Anita Whitney, social activist and prominent member of the Socialist party. In late 1919, authorities arrested her for participating in a November convention of the Communist Labor party (CLP), an organization from which she had recently resigned. At Whitney's trial, the prosecution introduced considerable IWW literature in an attempt to tie the organization to the CLP, which had generally endorsed IWW objectives. Whitney did not deny her short‐lived CLP membership, and the jury convicted her solely on that count—a classic example of guilt by association.

Subsequently, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously upheld the California statute on the basis of the state's power to protect the public from violent political action. However, in his concurrence, Justice Louis Brandeis, joined by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, contended that Whitney's attorneys should have argued for a clear and present danger test to distinguish between membership and dangerous action. They reasoned that the liberty protection of the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause joined with the First Amendment to protect freedom of assembly from state regulation (see Incorporation Doctrine).

The Brandeis concurrence became an important step in the Court's eventual acceptance of the clear and present danger test. In Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969), the Supreme Court overturned Whitney, but a modified version of the law remains in force.

See also Assembly and Association, Citizenship, Freedom of; Due Process, Substantive; Speech and the Press.

Carol E. Jenson

Cite this article
Pick a style below, and copy the text for your bibliography.

  • MLA
  • Chicago
  • APA

KERMIT L. HALL. "Whitney v. California." The Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States. 2005. Encyclopedia.com. 28 May. 2012 <http://www.encyclopedia.com>.

KERMIT L. HALL. "Whitney v. California." The Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States. 2005. Encyclopedia.com. (May 28, 2012). http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1O184-WhitneyvCalifornia.html

KERMIT L. HALL. "Whitney v. California." The Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States. 2005. Retrieved May 28, 2012 from Encyclopedia.com: http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1O184-WhitneyvCalifornia.html

Learn more about citation styles

Find thousands of answers for hundreds of subjects at Answers Encyclopedia .

All answers verified by trusted sources at Encyclopedia.com

Try Answers Encyclopedia now!

For students and teachers!

Encyclopedia.com provides students and teachers facts, information, and biographies from verified, citable sources, including:

Encyclopedia.com provides students and teachers facts, information, and biographies from verified, citable sources, including: