Davis v. Bandemer
The Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States
|
2005
|
|
© The Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States 2005, originally published by Oxford University Press 2005. (Hide copyright information)
Copyright
Davis v. Bandemer, 478 U.S. 109 (1986), argued 7 Oct. 1985, decided 30 June 1986: for justiciability by vote of 6 to 3, White for the Court, O'Connor, Burger, and Rehnquist in dissent; against merits by vote of 7 to 2, White for the Court, Powell and Stevens in dissent. Two central issues were posed in this case, in which Democrats contended that Indiana state legislative district lines were drawn by Republicans for partisan advantage: (1) is political gerrymandering justiciable? (see
Justiciability) and, if so, (2) did the districting in Indiana violate the Constitution's
Equal Protection Clause? In a complex division, the Court answered yes (6 to 3) to the first question and no (7 to 2) to the second. The plurality opinion, upholding both outcomes, was written by Justice Byron
White for himself, William
Brennan, Thurgood
Marshall, and Harry
Blackmun. Lewis
Powell and John Paul
Stevens would have upheld a district court decision that responded positively to both questions. The three remaining justices, Sandra Day
O'Connor, Warren
Burger, and William
Rehnquist, would have reversed the lower court's judgment invalidating the Indiana districting on the ground that political gerrymandering claims were nonjusticiable.
The plurality opinion concluded that political gerrymandering is subject to judicial scrutiny, but only where there is “continued frustration of the will of a majority of the voters or a denial to a minority of voters of a fair chance to influence the political process” (p. 133). The opinion found no evidence that Indiana's 1981 redistricting consigned the opposition party to seemingly perpetual minority status throughout the decade regardless of voting trends.
Davis v. Bandemer drew widespread attention. Ironically,
amicus curiae briefs were filed by the Republican National Committee supporting Indiana's Democrats and by California's Democratic congressional delegation in support of the Republican redistricting—in both instances reflecting concerns outside Indiana. Some legislative and congressional redistrictings after the 1990 census were expected to trigger appeals to the Supreme Court to apply the 1986 ruling's guidelines.
See also
Fair Representation;
Gerrymandering.
Gordon E. Baker
Cite this article
Pick a style below, and copy the text for your bibliography.
|
Political gerrymandering 2000-2008: "a self-limiting enterprise"?
Magazine article from: Harvard Law Review; 3/1/2009; 700+ words
; ...the threats and opportunities of political gerrymandering very seriously. (2) There seems...Davis v. Bandemer (4) that political gerrymandering claims were justiciable, lower...with a workable test for when political gerrymandering is constitutionally prohibited...
|
|
|
An interstate process perspective on political gerrymandering.
Magazine article from: Harvard Law Review; 3/1/2006; 700+ words
; ...before, Congress is the product of political gerrymandering. (1) Redistricting software...commentators have been quick to indict political gerrymandering on a plethora of grounds. For...16) All of these takes on political gerrymandering offer rich and diverse perspectives...
|
|
ANALYSIS: COURT DEFERS POLITICAL GERRYMANDERING CASE
News Wire article from: United Press International; 10/18/2004; 700+ words
; ...2004 Analysis: Court defers political gerrymandering case WASHINGTON, Oct 18, 2004...could decide on a challenge to political gerrymandering because there were no standards...rationale" for judging challenges to political gerrymandering, and even if the lower court...
|
|
Rigging election boundaries: When does it go too far? The Supreme Court Wednesday takes up a case on political gerrymandering that could affect districts across the US.(USA)
Newspaper article from: The Christian Science Monitor; 12/10/2003; 700+ words
; ...exclusively for Republicans. But experts say political gerrymandering has never been so prevalent or so effective...case to determine whether at some point political gerrymandering becomes so egregious as to violate safeguards...
|
|
Interview: Dan Ortiz discusses the need to reform political gerrymandering
Transcript from: NPR Weekend Edition - Sunday; 12/7/2003; ; 700+ words
; ...INSKEEP Weekend Edition - Sunday (NPR) 12-07-2003 Interview: Dan Ortiz discusses the need to reform political gerrymandering Host: STEVE INSKEEP Time: 8:00-9:00 PM STEVE INSKEEP, host: Here at home the US Supreme Court is...
|
|
Political gerrymandering in Millersville
Newspaper article from: Intelligencer Journal Lancaster, PA; 5/16/2005; 527 words
; TO THE EDITOR: With every election there are one or two horror stories. This year is no exception. With all the redistricting going on and all the political gamesmanship taking place, one sad story is being overlooked. In Millersville there had been five voting districts. Somewhere along the line
|
|
PUT AN END TO POLITICAL GERRYMANDERING
Newspaper article from: Roanoke Times & World News; 11/8/2007; 562 words
; Voters in a handful of "competitive" districts held an awesome power that turned Senate leadership over to the Democrats and whittled the Republican majority in the House. The Republican losses should be enough to convince their delegates that the best way to protect the party is to join with
|
 "The Cincinnati Post (Cincinnati, OH)")
|
ISSUE 4 WOULD CURB POLITICAL GERRYMANDERING.(Editorial)(Column)
Newspaper article from: The Cincinnati Post (Cincinnati, OH); 10/26/2005; 700+ words
; Byline: Michael E. Solimine The practice of drawing legislative districts to include or exclude certain groups of voters, or gerrymandering, has been around for two centuries. The colorful term is taken from the efforts of Elbridge Gerry, governor of Massachusetts in 1810, to draw a bizarrely
|
|
Court backs Texas redistricting
Newspaper article from: Charleston Gazette; 6/29/2006; ; 700+ words
; ...Justice Antonin Scalia complained that the court should have shut the door on all claims of political gerrymandering in map drawing. Justice John Paul Stevens took the opposite view. "By taking an action for the sole purpose of advantaging...
|
|
Justices Order New Look At Tex. Redistricting Case; GOP-Crafted Plan Stays in Effect for This Election
Newspaper article from: The Washington Post; 10/19/2004; ; 700+ words
; ...so entwined with partisan politics that no court could objectively decide how much political gerrymandering is too much. Four other justices -- John Paul Stevens, David H. Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen G. Breyer -- would have...
|
|
Davis v. Bandemer
Book article from: The Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States
Davis v. Bandemer, 478 U.S. 109 (1986), argued 7 Oct. 1985, decided 30 June...minority status throughout the decade regardless of voting trends. Davis v. Bandemer drew widespread attention. Ironically, amicus curiae briefs were...
|
|
|
Gerrymandering
Book article from: The Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States
...gerrymanders. Four leading cases— Wright v. Rockefeller (1964), United Jewish Organizations of Williamsburgh v. Carey (1977), Davis v. Bandemer (1986), and Badham v. Eu (1988)—...
|
|
|
Political Thicket
Book article from: The Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States
...Some sixteen years later in Baker v. Carr (1962), the Supreme Court...lawsuits. Two years later, in Reynolds v. Sims (1964), the Court adopted...see Reapportionment Cases ). In Davis v. Bandemer (1986), the Court ventured further...
|
|
|
Legislative Districting
Book article from: The Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States
...of districting and ruled in Baker v. Carr that a voter could challenge...Clause. Two years later, in Reynolds v. Sims , the Court promulgated the...redrawing of the legislative map. In Davis v. Bandemer (1986), a fractious Supreme Court...
|
