Find more facts and information on our topic page about
Sherbrooke
Arctic convoys
The Oxford Companion to World War II
|
2001
|
|
© The Oxford Companion to World War II 2001, originally published by Oxford University Press 2001. (Hide copyright information)
Copyright
Arctic convoys transported
matériel from UK and Icelandic ports for the Soviet war effort via the Norwegian and Barents seas. A total of 4.43 million tons was shipped by this route, 22.7% of the total Soviet
Lend-Lease supplies. The loss rate of
matériel was 7%, while the loss rate of eastbound merchant ships was 7.8% and 3.8% for empty westbound ones, far higher than any other route for Allied
convoys. The first convoy, which sailed from Scapa Flow in Scotland on 21 August 1941, carried Hurricane fighters and essential
raw materials. It was not allotted a lettered codename, but the next one, which sailed in September from Iceland, was codenamed PQ1—the letters apparently originating from the initials of an officer working in the British Admiralty.
Early shipments proved of little use, but the supplies of US trucks, boots, and telephone equipment shipped up to the beginning of 1942 were, almost certainly, of critical importance to the USSR during the fighting that summer in the
German–Soviet war though Soviet historians were only just beginning to acknowledge the part played by Lend-Lease before the USSR was dissolved in December 1991. Although the tonnage delivered was small at first, the convoys were—apart from the
strategic air offensive against Germany—the only weapon Churchill possessed with which to counter Stalin's demands for a Second Front (see
Grand Alliance).
The available routes were severely restricted by climatic and geographical factors, and their crews had to face heavy weather conditions and extreme cold. Though the long (or total) winter nights gave them some chance of escaping undetected, ice forced them closer to the Norwegian coastline and so within easier operational range of German forces based there.
Eastbound convoys normally kept as far from Norway as the prevailing ice conditions allowed and made either for the ice-free port of Murmansk or the White Sea ports of Archangel and Molotovsk. Each had a close escort of destroyers and smaller warships, and a distant escort of cruisers which were later replaced by a larger number of destroyers. Escorts were drawn predominantly from the Royal Navy, but also included US and Soviet ships, the latter not being as much in evidence as the Admiralty would have liked. Allied air patrols were also an essential element in protecting the convoys, though their range was limited, as were British and Soviet submarine patrols, part of whose task it was to watch the entrances of the Norwegian fjords containing, at different times, major German surface units. After PQ12 escaped an attack by the German battleship
Tirpitz in March 1942, distant cover by main units of the Home Fleet was also available to counter any threat that might develop from them. Later, when the convoys increased to 30 or more merchant ships, air cover was provided by aircraft from
CAM ships and escort carriers, and anti-aircraft (A-A) ships were also deployed.
The Germans, confident of an early victory after launching their invasion of the USSR in June 1941 (see
BARBAROSSA), took no interest in the early convoys and up to mid-March 1942 only two ships were lost. However, when they realized BARBAROSSA was not going to bring them a quick victory, they began, from December 1941, to increase their air and sea strength in northern Norway. This quickly became known to the Admiralty through
ULTRA intelligence, and eastbound and westbound convoys were ordered to sail simultaneously so that both could be given adequate cover.
PQ13 was the first convoy to have appreciable losses. After sailing on 20 March 1942 it was attacked not only by aircraft and U-boats but by destroyers from Kirkenes in northern Norway. ULTRA intelligence gave due warning of this and one destroyer was sunk and two damaged by the cruiser
Trinidad, but the convoy still lost five ships. Air attack now became increasingly lethal. On one day alone, 27 May 1942, no fewer than 108 aircraft attacked PQ16 from which seven ships were eventually lost. It was such heavy losses, and the sinking of two escorting cruisers and a number of other escorts, that led the First Sea Lord,
Admiral Pound, to comment that the convoys were ‘a most unsound operation with the dice loaded against us in every direction’. But he failed to persuade Churchill, who was under immense political pressure, to discontinue them.
By far the most disastrous convoy was the controversial PQ17 which sailed from Iceland on 27 June 1942. The Admiralty, aware of an impending attack, laid elaborate plans to safeguard it, and it was given a strong close escort of destroyers, A-A ships, and smaller vessels, and a distant escort of cruisers. But on the evening of 4 July ULTRA intelligence revealed that
Tirpitz, the cruiser
Hipper, and possibly the pocket battleship
Lützow, with a force of destroyers, had joined another cruiser,
Admiral Scheer, at Altenfjord, and that this powerful force was poised to overwhelm PQ17's cruiser escort before destroying the convoy itself. Pound consulted the
Naval Intelligence Division's Operational Intelligence Centre, but this could only offer evidence that suggested
Tirpitz had not put to sea. After deliberating with his staff Pound ordered the convoy to scatter and its escort to return. The individual ships were immediately pounced on by U-boats and bombers, and only 11 out of the original 37 reached their destination. After air reconnaissance had corrected an earlier error that PQ17's cruiser escort included a battleship, and had established that the British Home Fleet was too distant to interfere, the
Tirpitz force sailed the next afternoon ( 5 July), but it was soon recalled when it was realized that the convoy was already being eliminated. About 3,850 trucks and vehicles, 430 tanks, and 2,500 aircraft were lost, and 153 seamen died.
With hindsight, PQ17 might have been saved if it had been ordered to reverse course when the movements of
Tirpitz and
Admiral Hipper were first detected by ULTRA intelligence on 3 July. It could then have remained under the cover of the Home Fleet's major units until the situation had become clearer. But what seems virtually certain is that, if the order to scatter had not been given, neither escort nor convoy could have escaped almost total destruction once the
Tirpitz force had intercepted them, which it would have done on 6 July.
This catastrophe, and a dearth of escorts (which were being employed to help break the siege of
Malta), forced Churchill to suspend the convoys, much to Stalin's annoyance, and PQ18 did not sail until nine weeks later. By that time the C-in-C of the Home Fleet,
Admiral Tovey, had planned new tactics. Instead of eastbound and westbound convoys sailing together a Fighting Destroyer Escort (FDE) of 12 to 16 destroyers was formed which would transfer from the eastbound to the westbound convoy in the Barents Sea. Tovey also added an escort carrier to the defending force, and transferred to Soviet soil some search and strike aircraft. Although these tactics did not prevent the loss of 16 ships from the next two convoys, the Germans lost 4 U-boats and 41 aircraft.
After PQ18, the Arctic convoys were once more suspended as all available shipping was needed for the Allied
North African campaign landings in November 1942. By the time the convoys were restarted in December much of the German air strength in northern Norway had been transferred to the
Mediterranean, thus substantially reducing the threat. Each convoy was now given a new lettered code, JW for the outward convoy and RA for the homeward one, both starting with the number 51. Their size was such that it was decided to run them in two sections a fortnight apart so that they could be adequately escorted.
The first JW convoy was not detected and arrived intact, but JW51B was attacked on 31 December 1942 by
Lützow,
Admiral Hipper, and six destroyers. In the running battle which followed, known as the battle of the Barents Sea, the convoy was skilfully defended by its destroyer escort under Captain Robert Sherbrooke which, helped by the distant escort of cruisers, drove the German force off. The British lost two destroyers, including Sherbrooke's flagship, and a minesweeper, and had one merchantman damaged. However, the failure of the force, which lost one destroyer, to eradicate the convoy so infuriated Hitler that he ordered the decommissioning of all heavy ships. This was not carried out, but the German Navy's C-in-C,
Admiral Raeder, resigned and
Admiral Hipper and another cruiser,
Köln, were recalled to the Baltic.
The next two eastbound convoys were smaller and were therefore not divided. Both reached their destination unharmed, but the two westbound convoys lost five ships. In March 1943 the battle-cruiser
Scharnhorst, having escaped from Brest the previous February (see
CERBERUS), joined
Tirpitz and
Lützow in Norway. This added threat coincided with the climax of the
battle of the Atlantic, so once again the Arctic convoys were suspended while their escorts were transferred to the Atlantic, and they were not resumed until November 1943. By then
Tirpitz had been crippled by British
midget submarines and
Lützow had returned to Germany, and the one remaining threat,
Scharnhorst, was sunk in December when she tried to attack JW55B. The convoys were suspended once again between May and July 1944 because of the Normandy landings in June (see
OVERLORD). From February 1944 to 16 April 1945, when the last one sailed, the convoys were no longer divided. But they were so heavily defended that U-boats, even those equipped with homing torpedoes and
Schnorchels, were rarely able to penetrate the defensive screen, and only eight ships were lost. See also
German surface raiders.
Bibliography
Schofield, B. , The Arctic Convoys (London, 1977).
Cite this article
Pick a style below, and copy the text for your bibliography.
|
Effets economiques du Pole universitaire de Sherbrooke, 2003-2004/The economic effects of the Sherbrooke University Pole, 2003-2004.
Magazine article from: Canadian Journal of Regional Science; 3/22/2008; ; 700+ words
; "The Economic Effects of the Sherbrooke University Pole, 2003-2004". The Sherbrooke University Pole draws together nine institutions...2003/2004, of which about 64% was spent in Sherbrooke, 8% in the surrounding region of the Eastern...
|
|
CGI Opens New Center of Excellence in Sherbrooke.
PR Newswire; 6/13/2008; 700+ words
; ...opening of a new center of excellence in Sherbrooke. Along with provincial and municipal dignitaries...l'Exportation (MDEIE), the City of Sherbrooke and the academic members of the Sherbrooke University Pole, the center is expected...
|
|
Canada-Quebec Partnership to Benefit Sherbrooke; An important investment for the multi-sport and health centre at Bishop's University.
News Wire article from: Marketwire Canada; 9/21/2009; 700+ words
; SHERBROOKE, QUEBEC, Sep 21, 2009 (Marketwire...centre at Bishop's University, in Sherbrooke, as a priority project for infrastructure...University's will provide the City of Sherbrooke with modern sports infrastructure to...
|
|
WINGS DOWN BUT INSIST THEY'RE NOT OUT AGAINST SHERBROOKE.(Sports)
Newspaper article from: Albany Times Union (Albany, NY); 5/3/1987; 700+ words
; ...looking past us to the final round." Sherbrooke moved into a commanding position in...today (4p.m., WROW, 590 AM) in Sherbrooke. "We'll show up. I can guarantee...Adirondack, though, the prospect of beating Sherbrooke three consecutive times is not too good...
|
|
Sherbrooke Capital Announces Investment in FoodShouldTasteGood(TM).
Business Wire; 3/19/2007; 700+ words
; ...7227). The corrected release reads: SHERBROOKE CAPITAL ANNOUNCES INVESTMENT IN FOODSHOULDTASTEGOOD...Plans to Expand Distribution Nationwide Sherbrooke Capital Partners, L.L.C., a venture...marketing team. "This investment from Sherbrooke provides FoodShouldTasteGood[TM...
|
|
WINGS GEAR UP FOR SHERBROOKE.(Sports)
Newspaper article from: Albany Times Union (Albany, NY); 4/25/1987; 700+ words
; ...fitting that the Adirondack Red Wings and Sherbrooke Canadiens should meet in the Calder...start and we had a great finish," said Sherbrooke coach Pierre Creamer. The Canadiens...season series, 5-3. And although Sherbrooke has the home-ice advantage in this...
|
|
Program, technical tours and tourism make Sherbrooke the place to be in May. (76th Canadian Society for Chemistry Conference and Exhibition at Sherbrooke, Quebec)
Magazine article from: Canadian Chemical News; 3/1/1993; ; 700+ words
; ...Conference and Exhibition (May 30-June 3, Sherbrooke, QC, convention centre), chair Carmel...which is located at the Universite de Sherbrooke. The Environment Division will feature...department of chemistry, Universite de Sherbrooke. Co-organizers are Andre Michel...
|
|
Scientists at University of Sherbrooke discuss research in life sciences.
Newspaper article from: Cancer Weekly; 9/2/2008; 700+ words
; According to a study from Sherbrooke, Canada, The biodistribution and...Benard and colleagues, University of Sherbrooke (see also Life Sciences). The...contact F. Benard, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke Molecular Imaging Center...
|
|
Study findings from University of Sherbrooke broaden understanding of trigeminal neuralgia.(Report)
Newspaper article from: Biotech Week; 3/4/2009; 700+ words
; ...drug-resistant TN," scientists in Sherbrooke, Canada report (see also Trigeminal...Knafo and colleagues, University of Sherbrooke. The researchers concluded: "Gamma...contact D. Mathieu, University of Sherbrooke, CHU Sherbrooke, Division Neurosurgery...
|
|
Study findings from University of Sherbrooke, Medical Department provide new insights into brain cancer.(Report)
Newspaper article from: Cancer Weekly; 7/7/2009; 700+ words
; According to recent research from Sherbrooke, Canada, "The purpose of this study...anticonvulsants). Our QOL questionnaire, the Sherbrooke Neuro-Oncology Assessment Scale...Goffaux and colleagues, University of Sherbrooke, Medical Department (see also Brain...
|
|
Sherbrooke
Book article from: The Columbia Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition
Sherbrooke city (1991 pop. 76,429), S Que., Canada, at the confluence of the Magog and the...plants producing mining machinery, rubber products, and leather goods. The Univ. of Sherbrooke (1954) is in the city.
|
|
Robert Lowe Sherbrooke, Viscount
Book article from: The Columbia Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition
Robert Lowe Sherbrooke, Viscount , 1811-92, British statesman. He emigrated (1842...as chancellor of the exchequer (1868-73). In his first budgets Sherbrooke successfully reduced taxes, but he carried the Liberal policy of...
|
|
University of Sherbrooke
Book article from: The Columbia Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition
University of Sherbrooke at Sherbrooke, Que., Canada; French language; founded 1954. It has faculties of letters and human sciences, science, administration, law, applied science, medicine, education, physical education, and theology.
|
|
Robert Lowe, Viscount Sherbrooke
Book article from: The Columbia Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition
Robert Lowe, Viscount Sherbrooke see Sherbrooke, Robert Lowe, Viscount .
|
|
Quebec
Book article from: The Columbia Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition
...Laval , Trois Rivières, Gatineau , Sherbrooke , and Hull . Economy and Higher Education The forests...Laval Univ., at Quebec city; the Univ. of Sherbrooke, at Sherbrooke; and the Univ. of Quebec, with an administrative...
|