|
SIC 2011 Meat Packing Plants
Encyclopedia of American Industries
|
2005
|
COPYRIGHT 2005 The Gale Group, Inc. This material is published under license from the publisher through the Gale Group, Farmington Hills, Michigan. All inquiries regarding rights should be directed to the Gale Group.
(Hide copyright information)
Copyright
|
SIC 2011
MEAT PACKING PLANTS
This industry includes establishments primarily engaged in the slaughtering (for their own account or on a contract basis for the trade) of cattle, hogs, sheep, lambs, and calves for meat to be sold or to be used on the same premises in canning, cooking, curing, freezing, and in making sausage, lard, and other products. The industry also includes establishments primarily engaged in slaughtering horses for human consumption. Businesses primarily engaged in slaughtering, dressing, and packing poultry, rabbits, and other small game are classified in SIC 2015: Poultry Slaughtering and Processing. Those primarily engaged in slaughtering and processing animals not for human consumption are classified in SIC 2048: Prepared Feeds and Feed Ingredients for Animals and Fowls, Except Dogs and Cats. Businesses primarily involved in manufacturing sausages and meat specialties from purchased meats are classified in SIC 2013: Sausages and Other Prepared Meat Products.
NAICS Code(s)
311611 (Animal (Except Poultry) Slaughtering)
Industry Snapshot
Meat packing is one of the largest agriculture-based industries in the United States. However, in recent years changing consumer eating habits have impacted the beef and pork industries, which are by far the largest sectors in this industry category. As Americans ate less beef, the beef industry retrenched, eliminating smaller and inefficient plants, and expanding their operations to incorporate poultry products. At the same time, the pork industry was striving to reposition pork as "the meat of choice."
Although technically a "red" meat, it was gaining acceptance as an alternative to the other white meat, chicken.
In 2001 the industry shipped $60.6 billion worth of products, up 3 percent from 2000 and up 12 percent from 1998. Rapid and widespread consolidation within the industry has placed hog and beef meat packing under the control of just a handful of larger players. Operating on very thin margins, processing plants are under constant pressure to keep costs low and volume high.
Organization and Structure
The American Meat Institute (AMI) reported that there were more than 1.25 million livestock operations, raising beef cattle, hogs, and sheep destined for human consumption in the United States in the 1990s. The meat packing plants that processed these animals into food and nonfood products ranged in size from those handling small numbers of livestock to operations processing millions of animals a year. According to the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), federally inspected slaughter and processing plants numbered 930 in 1998.
The dominance of a few major companies is demonstrated by the fact that four packers processed approximately 82 percent of the beef, and three packers processed close to 35 percent of the pork. The USDA reports that in 1998, nearly 35.5 million commercial cattle were slaughtered, representing a 2 percent decrease from 1997. Also in 1998, 101.0 million commercial hogs (an increase of 10 percent) and 3.8 million sheep and lambs (a decrease of 3 percent) were slaughtered.
According to the USDA, the U.S. meat and poultry industry is spread among all 50 states. Industry sources indicate that the Midwestern states raised about 46 percent of the cattle and over 15 percent of the hogs in the 1990s, while south central states raised more than 15 percent of the cattle and nearly 70 percent of the hogs. The top five cattle slaughtering states were Kansas, Nebraska, Texas, Colorado, and Iowa. Iowa, Illinois, Minnesota, North Carolina, and South Dakota led in the slaughter of hogs, according to the USDA. Pennsylvania, which had the largest number of federally inspected plants, representing almost 14 percent of all plants in the United States, ranked only 11th in production.
Background and Development
The colonial farmers of New England, who were the first meat packers in the United...
|
Interview: Matthew Chapman talks about the theory of his great-great-grandfather, Charles Darwin
Transcript from: NPR Special
; ...you were a kid because Charles Darwin was your great-great-grandfather...great-grandfather was Charles Darwin, you know, a pretty smart guy. My great-grandfather was Sir Francis Darwin, who was a relatively good biologist...
|
|
GOOD STOCK DOESN'T MEAN GOOD BOOK, IN DARWIN PROGENY'S CASE.(Spotlight)(Review)
Newspaper article from: Rocky Mountain News (Denver, CO)
; Byline: Patti Thorn Charles Darwin's great-great-grandson is...since. ``First there was Charles Darwin, two yards long and nobody's...son, my great-grandfather, Sir Francis Darwin, an eminent botanist. Then came...
|
|
Going Ape over Darwin: Mark Bryant on cartoons of the man who shook Victorian society to the core.(CARTOON TIMES)(Charles Darwin)
Magazine article from: History Today
; ...ILLUSTRATION OMITTED] Charles Darwin was a gift to Victorian...poet and physician Erasmus Darwin, and a relation of both...famous pottery firm) and Sir Francis Galton (founder of eugenics), Charles Darwin had been intended for the...
|
|
Unnerved by ancestral voices
Magazine article from: The Spectator
; ...the link with Darwin. And when Darwin called his second book The Descent...progeny: First there was Charles Darwin, two yards long and nobody's...son, my great-grandfather, Sir Francis Darwin, an eminent botanist. Then came...
|
|
Pearls of wisdom.(Editor's Note)
Magazine article from: Entrepreneur
; ...expect new evils; for time is the greatest innovator." FRANCIS BACON "... the credit goes to the man who convinces...world, not to the man to whom the idea first occurs." SIR FRANCIS DARWIN "You see things, and you say, 'Why?' But I dream...
|
|
Persuading powerfully: Tips for writing persuasive documents
Magazine article from: et Cetera
; ...the content we convey. Unquestionably, our reader interest hangs in the balance. 1. Create powerful openings Sir Francis Darwin, son of the famous biologist, said, "The credit goes to the man who convinces the world, not to the man to whom...
|
|
A name to conjure with.(AGM 2008: Chicago)(Essay)
Magazine article from: Persuasions: The Jane Austen Journal
; ...Victorian period, vaunting one's repeated re-readings of the novels has been the very touchstone of Janeism. Sir Francis Darwin brags that Macaulay himself could not have endured to read her as often as I have (65-66). Reporting that Disraeli...
|
|
Ultimate therapy: commercial eugenics in the 21st century.(a prescription for the world: INTERNATIONAL HEALTH)
Magazine article from: Harvard International Review
; ...the defining social dynamic of the new century. Friendly Eugenics The term "eugenics" was conceived by Sir Francis Galton, Charles Darwin's cousin, in the 19th century and is generally divided along two lines. Negative eugenics involves the...
|
|
Who Will Decide Between Defect and Perfect?
Newspaper article from: The Washington Post
; ...of the event, was any mention of the word "eugenics." That term -- conceived in the 19th century by Sir Francis Galton, Charles Darwin's cousin -- is generally divided along two lines. Negative eugenics involves the systematic elimination...
|
|
Creating the `perfect' human
Newspaper article from: Chicago Sun-Times
; ...from the discussion was any mention of the word "eugenics." That term - conceived in the 19th century by Sir Francis Galton, Charles Darwin's cousin - generally is divided along two lines. Negative eugenics involves the systematic elimination...
|
Find more facts and information related to the
article "SIC 2011 Meat Packing Plants"