|
Provisionally permanent? Keeping temporary custody orders temporary under the Hague Convention on International Child Abduction.
From:
University of Pennsylvania Law Review
| Date:
December 1, 2002| Author:
Di Guglielmo, Christine T.
| COPYRIGHT 2002 University of Pennsylvania, Law School. This material is published under license from the publisher through the Gale Group, Farmington Hills, Michigan. All inquiries regarding rights should be directed to the Gale Group.Copyright information
|
INTRODUCTION
In 1980, the Hague Conference on Private International Law (1) created the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (2) (Convention) as an attempt to supply parents with a legal tool to assist them in achieving the return of children removed across international boundaries without consent of the left-behind parents. (3) The Convention has been in force in the United States for more than thirteen years, (4) and a significant body...
Related newspaper, magazine, and journal articles from HighBeam Research
|
Provisionally permanent? Keeping temporary custody orders temporary under the Hague Convention on International Child Abduction.
University of Pennsylvania Law Review
; INTRODUCTION In 1980, the Hague Conference on Private International Law (1) created the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (2) (Convention) as an attempt to supply parents with a legal tool to assist them in achieving the return of children removed across
|
|
The trials and tribulations of implementing the Hague Convention on international child abduction: Improving dispute resolution and enforcement of parental rights in the international arena
The George Washington International Law Review
; I. INTRODUCTION The relative ease and affordability of travel and communication and the opening of the world's markets contribute to greater interaction between people from different countries.1 There is an increasing interconnectedness between communities, cultures, and countries across the globe.
|
|
Risky Custody Agreement
Jerusalem Post
; 00-00-0000 Headline: Risky Custody Agreement Byline: Adv. Amihoud Borochov & Adv. Louise Borochov Edition; City Lights Section: Features Page: 09 Friday, February 21, 2003 -- Background: I am an American living in the US, where I married an Israeli woman.We have a son, 3, who was born in the US
|
|
Commentary: A 'snapshot' of the Hague Convention
Daily Record and the Kansas City Daily News-Press
; (This article originally ran in Michigan Lawyers Weekly, Detroit, MI, another Dolan Media publication). With the understandable angst of many people in the post-9/11 reality, many divorce clients wonder what - if anything - is in place to safeguard their children from a spouse who tries to take the
|
|
Patching up the abduction convention: A call for a new international protocol and a suggestion for amendments to ICARA
Texas International Law Journal
; SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION The 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of the Child Abduction1 is not always part of international litigation symposia, where the focus is more likely to be on strictly commercial matters. But it is especially fitting to include this subject in a symposium issue
|
|
Interpreting the Hague Convention on International Child Abduction: Why American Courts Need to Reconcile the Rights of Non-Custodial Parents, the Best Interests of Abducted Children, and the Underlying Objectives of the Hague Convention
The Review of Litigation
; I. INTRODUCTION Child abduction often conjures images of an unknown abductor forcefully snatching a child off the street. In the context of private international law, however, this term refers to the unilateral removal or retention of a child, often by a parent, guardian, or close family member in
|
|
In divided en banc ruling, Eighth Circuit concludes that courts must determine child's "habitual residence" under Child Abduction Convention as of abduction date which, in this case, was Israel.
International Law Update
; Robert Silverman and Julie Hechter met in Israel in 1988 and married in Seattle, Washington, in 1989. They next moved to the U.S. where their two children, Samuel and Jacob, were born. In 1999, the family moved back to Israel. Julie intermittently returned to the U.S. to attend bankruptcy
|
|
New Zealand Court of Appeal denies U.S. father's petition under Hague Abduction Convention to have child returned to his former habitual residence in Illinois since child had lived long enough away from Illinois to have lost his habitual residence there and to have acquired new habitual residence in New Zealand.
International Law Update
; Mr. SK (plaintiff), a United States citizen residing in Chicago, Illinois where he has a successful law practice, and Ms. KP (defendant), a New Zealand citizen, met in the U.S. in 1993. Five years later, they were married in Scotland, and returned to live in Illinois. The defendant became pregnant
|
|
The Gitter Standard: Creating a Uniform Definition of Habitual Residence under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction
Chicago Journal of International Law
; INTRODUCTION Each year hundreds of children are kidnapped by one parent and taken across international borders while the other parent suffers from the traumatic loss of a child.1 Between October 1, 2003, and September 30, 2004, 154 of these abducted children were returned after a Hague application
|
|
Israeli court has authority to rule on custody dispute
St. Louis Daily Record / St. Louis Countian
; A custody dispute between a mother who lives in the United States and a father who lives in Israel must be decided in Israel because a divided 8th Circuit found that Israel is the habitual residence of the two children. This opinion, handed down last week by the full 8th U.S. Circuit Court of
|