After acquiring an audience: a brief reply to the June 2001 critique regarding after-acquired evidence.(response to article by Terry A. Venneberg, Alaska Law Review, vol. 18, p. 59, 2001) From: Alaska Law Review | Date: December 1, 2001| Author: | COPYRIGHT 2001 Duke University, School of Law. This material is published under license from the publisher through the Gale Group, Farmington Hills, Michigan.  All inquiries regarding rights should be directed to the Gale Group.Copyright information

This Reply briefly answers a critique by Terry A. Venneberg of the author's previous article addressing the use of after-acquired evidence in employment cases in Alaska.

I was gratified to read the June 2001 critique (1) of my article analyzing the use of after-acquired evidence in employment cases in Alaska, (2) if only to confirm that someone, somewhere, actually read my article (other than my mother). I was perhaps more pleased that my analysis inspired others to publish. Good academic dialogue inspires, perhaps provokes, responses to which replies are customarily granted. ...

Related newspaper, magazine, and trade journal articles from HighBeam Research

(Including press releases, facts, information, and biographies)

A brief analysis of after-acquired evidence in employment cases: a proposed model for Alaska (and points south). ; ...holds that after-acquired evidence bars suit...existence of after-acquired evidence by a preponderance...based on after-acquired evidence should be...the use of after-acquired evidence.(9) This...might use after-acquired ...

For more facts and information, see all results