Answering Justice Thomas in Saenz: granting the Privileges or Immunities Clause full citizenship within the Fourteenth Amendment.

From: Stanford Law Review | Date: February 1, 2000| Author: Shaffer, Derek | Copyright information

Justice Thomas's dissent from the Supreme Court's decision in Saenz v. Roe,(2) handed down in May of this past year, signals a possible reawakening of the long comatose Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment ("the Clause"). In Saenz, Justice Stevens's majority opinion called upon the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment(3) as a substantive guarantee of personal liberties, specifically "the right of [a] newly arrived citizen to the same pr...

Related newspaper, magazine, and journal articles from HighBeam Research

The Slaughterhouse Cases: Regulation, Reconstruction, and the Fourteenth Amendment.(The Fourteenth Amendment and the Law of the Constitution)(Book Review)
Journal of Southern History ; The Slaughterhouse Cases: Regulation, Reconstruction, and the Fourteenth Amendment. By Ronald M. Labbe and Jonathan Lurie. (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, c. 2003. Pp. xiv, 295. Paper, $15.95, ISBN 0-7006-1409-5; cloth, $34.95, ISBN 0-7006-1290-4.) The Fourteenth Amendment and the Law of the
The Slaughterhouse Cases: Regulation, Reconstruction, and the Fourteenth Amendment/The Fourteenth Amendment and the Law of the Constitution
The Journal of Southern History ; The Slaughterhouse Cases: Regulation, Reconstruction, and the Fourteenth Amendment. By Ronald M. Labb and Jonathan Lurie. (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, c. 2003. Pp. xiv, 295. Paper, $15.95, ISBN 0-7006-1409-5; cloth, $34.95, ISBN 0-7006-1290-4.) The Fourteenth Amendment and the Law of the
The Cherokee removal and the Fourteenth Amendment.
Duke Law Journal ; ABSTRACT This Article recasts the original understanding of the Fourteenth Amendment by showing how its drafters were influenced by the events that culminated in The Trail of Tears. A fresh review of the primary sources reveals that the removal of the Cherokee Tribe by President Andrew Jackson was
The McCulloch theory of the Fourteenth Amendment: City of Boerne v. Flores and the original understanding of section 5.
Yale Law Journal ; I. INTRODUCTION Twentieth-century eyes have long read the Fourteenth Amendment as though it were addressed to the judiciary. The historical fact that the Supreme Court, and not Congress, has taken the lead in defining our constitutional liberties has left lawyers looking to the courts to fulfill
Fourteenth Amendment personhood: Fact or fiction?
St. John's Law Review ; The United States Constitution "has stood the test of over two hundred years [and has] preserved and protected our basic rights and liberties."1 The interpretation of this governing document must be limited to ensure uniformity of law and equality of rights.2 Such limitation becomes crucial,