|
America's grand strategy. (American foreign policy)
From:
The National Interest
| Date:
March 22, 1996| Author:
Kurth, James
| COPYRIGHT 1996 The National Interest, Inc. This material is published under license from the publisher through the Gale Group, Farmington Hills, Michigan. All inquiries regarding rights should be directed to the Gale Group.Copyright information
|
The US has experienced three historical cycles that have shaped its foreign policy. The territorial annexation cycle involved the continental expansion policy which resulted to the US' acquisition of Louisiana and southwestern territories. The regional sphere cycle refers to the US' establishment of spheres of influence in Central America, Asia and the Caribbean. The international order cycle is also expansionist in nature but is geared towards the opening other economies to the US.
...
Related newspaper, magazine, and journal articles from HighBeam Research
|
The case for "integration".(United States foreign policy)
The National Interest
; ... sh's presidency has also had an impact. But much of today's anti-Americanism need not be either structural or permanent; the good news is that there are signs that it is abating in some places. Anti-Americanism should be taken seriously, though: It makes it more ...
|
|
How the United States sold its soul to win the cold war, and now cannot develop a coherent post-cold war foreign policy
International Journal
; Distinguished Research Professor of History at Montana State University. This is a slightly amended version of an address delivered to women historians at the annual meeting of the Society for Historians of American Foreign Relations (SHAFR), Toronto, June 2000. AT THE END OF THE TWENTIETH CENTURY,
|
|
United States Foreign Policy in the Twenty-First Century: The Crisis and Renewal of the Republican Empire.
Journal of Power and Ethics
; Abstract The last decade of the 20th Century has been a consistent record of bi-partisan failure to develop a coherent foreign policy successfully confronting both the unprecedented opportunities and threats of an evolving world in search of a new geopolitical equilibrium. Attempting to exercise
|
|
Bottom-up foreign policy. (United States)
Foreign Policy
; More than six years since the fall of the Berlin Wall, two administrations have tried and failed to construct a post-Cold War foreign policy that enjoys intellectual support among specialists and political acceptance within the country at large. Neither the new world order , of the Bush
|
|
Mixed Messages Sent, Mixed Messages Received: Asian Views of the United States and Multilateralism 2004-2005
Hampton Roads International Security Quarterly
; The United States' approach to multilateral international relations continues to be at odds with the practices and desires of most of its Asian partners. The United States emphasizes effectiveness and good outcomes (as defined by the U.S.) rather than process. For most Asian states the processes of
|
|
Seven in Ten Americans Favor Congressional Candidates Who Will Pursue a Major Change in Foreign Policy ; Most Americans Say Current Policies Increase Threat of Terrorism, Diminish Goodwill toward United States
U.S. Newswire
; To: National Desk Contact: Stephen Weber of the Program on International Policy Attitudes, 202-232-7500 WASHINGTON, Oct. 20 /U.S. Newswire/ -- Going into the November midterm elections, seven in ten Americans say they prefer Congressional candidates who will pursue a new approach to U.S. foreign
|
|
[Global focus: United States foreign policy at the turn of the millennium]
International Journal
; New York: St. Martin's, 2000, xxv, 340pp, US$65 cloth, US$19.95 paper, (ISBN 0-312-22581-4) Global Focus is a product of the innovative Foreign Policy in Focus project, a joint endeavour of the Institute for Policy Studies in Washington, DC, and the Interhemispheric Resource Center in New Mexico.
|
|
International mavericks: A comparative analysis of selected human rights and foreign policy issues in Iran and the United States
The George Washington International Law Review
; INTRODUCTION The question "Why do nations obey international law?"1 suggests a follow-up query: "Why do nations refuse to obey international law?" Starting down that path, a student of American law interested in international human rights might well ask: "Why does the United States, with an entire
|
|
Neo-imperialism and American foreign policy: Louis Janowski criticizes the United States' foreign policy approach and calls for a reduction in its international commitments.
New Zealand International Review
; ... out knowledge. Coming from a military background, and with his experiences in Vietnam, Powell was undoubtedly aware that bad news is repeatedly filtered by multiple levels of bureaucracy (probably five or six levels at State) before it reaches senior decision-make ...
|
|
Double Take: Has President Bush's record on international organizations and treaties benefited the United States?; Go-it-alone approach hurts position in world community
Telegraph - Herald (Dubuque)
; ... now embarked on a perilous course that threatens to bring nuclear proliferation and global destabilization. The only hopeful news came when the United States and Russia signed a treaty to reduce their respective nuclear arsenals. Both nations agreed to a ...
|