Defending the dinosaur: the case for not fixing the filibuster. (Senate filibuster) From: Brookings Review | Date: June 22, 1995| Author: Frenzel, Bill | COPYRIGHT 1995 Brookings Institution. This material is published under license from the publisher through the Gale Group, Farmington Hills, Michigan.  All inquiries regarding rights should be directed to the Gale Group.Copyright information

The Senate filibuster has been criticized for being unconstitutional and has even acquired a negative connotation. However, it is part of the system of checks and balances instituted by the founding fathers of the US to prevent the passage of laws based on the whim of the majority. The American public is also occasionally annoyed by the filibuster but are not clamoring for its removal. The Republican-dominated Congress voted in early 1995 against changing the filibuster, proof that it is stil...

Related newspaper, magazine, and journal articles from HighBeam Research

	Slaying the dinosaur: the case for reforming the Senate filibuster. Brookings Review ; During the 103rd Congress, when Democrats controlled both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue for the first time since Jimmy Garter was president, House Democrats bristled at the way the Senate filibuster was distorting the balance between the chambers and radically reshaping or killing legislation that
	American political mythology and the Senate filibuster.(Special Issue: Argumentation and the U.S. Senate) Argumentation and Advocacy ; ... public and because of the promise that he would serve as little more than a conduit for the voice of the people. The contemporary news media's increased reliance on opinion polls for public policy issues has forced elected officials to confront the mirror vs ...
	Defending the dinosaur: the case for not fixing the filibuster. (Senate filibuster) Brookings Review ; Defending the filibuster may not be quite as nasty as taking candy from a baby, but neither is it a good route to popular acclaim. Few kind words are ever spoken in defense of filibusters. Conventional wisdom and political correctness have pronounced them to be pernicious. The very word is
	The filibuster - a debate that has never ended; Republicans draw closer to changing the Senate rules on approving court nominees.(USA) The Christian Science Monitor ; Byline: Gail Russell Chaddock Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor WASHINGTON -- Named after a swift boat used by marauding West Indian pirates, the filibuster has long been the sharpest weapon in the Senate's procedural arsenal - and as such a point of recurring controversy. It has been
	The Senate filibuster.(Opinion/Editorial) Manila Bulletin ; FOR a few days, Senator Serge Osmena had conducted a series of speeches known in American legislative practice as a filibuster. This action was resorted to supposedly as a means to stop the appointment of Senate President Pro Tempore Manuel Villar as chairman of both the Committees on Agriculture
	The Senate filibuster: a constitutional critique. Perspectives on Political Science ; ... civil rights filibusters of the mid-century decades has this unusual Senate procedure occupied such a prominent place in the news. Although its place in the public spotlight has been relatively infrequent, there is little question that its use at key times ...
	HIGH COURT NOMINATIONS MAY HINGE ON FILIBUSTER DEBATE SENATE IS DIVIDED ON CONSTITUTIONALITY The Boston Globe ; WASHINGTON - Talk of a possible vacancy on the Supreme Court is rising with the arrival of June and the last month of the current term. If there is an opening, however, a nominee's fate may depend on what happens to the filibuster rule in the Senate, now under siege. A filibuster, one of the
	The filibuster is the talk of the Senate.(NEWS) Star Tribune (Minneapolis, MN) ; Byline: Eric Black; Staff Writer You might assume that the big fight in the U.S. Senate over the filibuster is really all about power and partisan politics. And you might be right. But if you listen to the senators argue, they are mostly talking about respecting history, following the Constitution
	In the Senate, the Dole Filibuster Busts The Designs of the Founding Fathers The Washington Post ; YEARS FROM now, when people in Washington wake up and realize what happened, maybe someone will make a Hollywood political thriller about the filibuster "coup" of 1994. Instead of "Z," the title should be "Zzzz." For when the nation's capital experienced an extra-constitutional transfer of
	Interview: Ross Baker discusses the history of the filibuster and procedural change in the Senate All Things Considered (NPR) ; ROBERT SIEGEL All Things Considered (NPR) 04-21-2005 Interview: Ross Baker discusses the history of the filibuster and procedural change in the Senate Host: ROBERT SIEGEL Time: 9:00-10:00 PM ROBERT SIEGEL, host: The argument in the Senate is about the Constitution; it's about the rules of that

See all results.