The Journal of Social Psychology

Sex differences, weapon focus, and eyewitness reliability.

The Journal of Social Psychology | August 1, 1994 | Copyright

EYEWITNESS TESTIMONY TYPICALLY HAS a powerful impact on juries and may determine whether a defendant is convicted or exonerated. Loftus (1974) found that mock jurors were nearly four times as likely to convict defendants when circumstantial evidence was corroborated by an eyewitness, even when it was known that the eyewitness had poor eyesight and had not been wearing eyeglasses when he or she witnessed the crime. Wells, Lindsay, and Ferguson (1979) and Brigham and Bouthwell (1983) obtained similar results. Despite the credibility jurors ascribe to eyewitness testimony, studies of…

Related newspaper, magazine, and trade journal articles from HighBeam Research

(Including press releases, facts, information, and biographies)

Sex differences, weapon focus, and eyewitness reliability.
Magazine article from: The Journal of Social Psychology ...members of the opposite sex), similar to the...researchers who have studied sex differences in eyewitness reliability have not attempted to investigate the own-sex bias hypothesis...error known as the weapon focus effect. This error...

For more facts and information, see all results

Find more facts and information related to the article Sex differences, weapon focus, and eyewitness ...