Fordham Urban Law Journal

How the pickers pick: finding a set of best practices for judicial nominating commissions.(Rethinking Judicial Selection: A Critical Appraisal of Appointive Selection for State Court Judges)

Fordham Urban Law Journal | January 1, 2007 | Copyright
 
   States and municipalities still seek to build upon and improve 
   the judicial selection methods used by prior generations. Like 
   most institutional arrangements that are responsive to the needs 
   of society, judicial selection demands an on-going process that 
   borrows and profits from the past, meets the needs of the present 
   and remains flexible to permit future adaptation. (1) 

At the core of any system of justice is the judge, the arbiter of society's conflicts. While good judges cannot ensure a just society, arguing that the quality of the judiciary is…

Related newspaper, magazine, and trade journal articles from HighBeam Research

(Including press releases, facts, information, and biographies)

How the pickers pick: finding a set of best practices for judicial nominating...
Magazine article from: Fordham Urban Law Journal ...of judicial selection in the states...called "merit selection" method...these merit selection plans and addresses...function of judicial nominating commissions. The third...to develop a set of "best practices" that can be...

For more facts and information, see all results

Find more facts and information related to the article How the pickers pick: finding a set of best ...