Making sense of Penn Central.(regulatory takings law)

From: UCLA Journal of Environmental Law & Policy | Date: December 22, 2005| Author: Echeverria, John D. | Copyright information

"[W]e have frequently observed that whether a particular restriction will be rendered invalid by the government's failure to pay for any losses proximately caused by it depends largely upon the particular circumstances [in that] case."--Penn Central Transportation Co. v. City of New York, 438 U.S. 104, 124 (1978).

"[A] 'totality of the circumstances' analysis masks intellectual bankruptcy."--Thomas Merrill, "The Economics of Public Use," 72 Cornell L. Rev. 61, 92 (1986)....

Related newspaper, magazine, and journal articles from HighBeam Research

Do owners have a fair chance of prevailing under the ad hoc regulatory takings test of Penn Central Transportation Company?
Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum ; Recent Supreme Court decisions on regulatory takings 12 constitute a shift from per se categorical tests to the ad hoc balancing test of Penn Central Transportation Co. v. City of New York (3) and to an explicit recognition that the area of regulatory takings is so complex that no substantive rule
TAKINGS AND PRIVATE PROPERTY ON THE REHNQUIST COURT
Northwestern University Law Review ; ... position to avoid some of the problems Rehnquist and Scalia have encountered in the law of takings. But if he does, that will be news about the Court after the Rehnquist Court. VI. CONCLUSION The Rehnquist Court's regulatory takings cases teach at least two enduring ...
The Endangered Species Act and fifth amendment takings: Constitutional limits of species protection
Yale Journal on Regulation ; Blaine I. Green^ In a political climate increasingly sensitive to the property owners' rights to be free from regulatory intrusions by the federal government, the Endangered Species Act (ESA) has become a popular symbolic target for property rights advocates. This Article suggests that the ESA is a
THE PROBLEM OF EQUALITY IN TAKINGS
Northwestern University Law Review ; INTRODUCTION After decades of confusion, the Supreme Court in a recent series of decisions has begun to bring clarity to the law of regulatory takings.1 In doing so, the Court is bringing to the fore a previously submerged theme in the jurisprudence-what this Article calls the equality dimension of
PENN CENTRAL MAY SPIN OFF SPRAGUE
The Boston Globe ; Penn Central Corp. said yesterday it will consider spinning off its Sprague Electric Corp. subsidiary in an effort to give shareholders a better deal. Sprague, based in Lexington, is an electronics company with about 8,000 employees and 1986 revenues of $449.1 million. Not since 1976, when the
New developments in regulatory takings: the Supreme Court takes an interest in the fee simple estate. (Law and the Appraiser).(Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency)
Appraisal Journal ; Appraisers are asked to serve as consultants or expert witnesses in litigation involving alleged regulatory takings of private property. However, their involvement is usually limited to providing valuation opinions related to the economic impact of a regulation or the amount of compensation due to
Cincinnati Holding Company Penn Central to Change Name. (Originated from The Philadelphia Inquirer)
Knight Ridder/Tribune Business News ; Mar. 2--A Cincinnati holding company that runs a couple of insurance businesses announced Tuesday that it was going to change its name, and with that, the Penn Central Corporation ceases to exist. The New York Stock Exchange won't officially list the new moniker, American Premier Underwriters,
Measure 37: paying people for what we take.(regulatory takings)(Oregon)
Environmental Law ; ... vetoed the bill, explaining incredibly at a news conference that such regulations were necessary ... available at http://www.statesman.com/news/content/ shared/tx/legislature/stories ... B3, available at http://www.jsonline.com/news/state/may05/325409.asp (noting that in ...
Celebrating Tahoe-Sierra.(regulatory takings)
Environmental Law ; I. INTRODUCTION II. THE ESSENTIAL BACKGROUND FACTS A. Tahoe's Tragedy of the Commons B. The Tahoe Regional Planning Agency C. The Ninth Circuit Decision III. THE HIGHLIGHTS A. Severance of Physical from Regulatory Takings B. Reaffirmation of Parcel as a Whole C. Diminishment of Lucas D. Potentially
The impact of Tahoe-Sierra on temporary regulatory takings law.
UCLA Journal of Environmental Law & Policy ; I. INTRODUCTION This paper explores the development of temporary regulatory takings law, the Supreme Court's latest temporary takings opinion--Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (2and the impact of Tahoe-Sierra on subsequent lower court temporary takings decisions.