Trade-speak: your guide to GATT jargon. (General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade) (Glossary)

From: AgExporter | Date: June 1, 1994 | Copyright information

Like specialists in any other field, trade negotiators have developed their own unique language that can be as inaccessible as the toughest trade barrier. The Uruguay Round agreement has further enriched the already-arcane language of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). The following glossary is a brief guide to some of the more important terms and concepts relating to agriculture in the Uruguay Round and GATT agreements.

A

Aggregate Measure...

Related newspaper, magazine, and journal articles from HighBeam Research

Trade-speak: your guide to GATT jargon. (General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade) (Glossary)
AgExporter ; ... may apply stricter standards, if they are justified. Greater harmonization in import regulations around the world would be good news for exporters, while increased application of international SPS standards would provide greater protection for consumers in many ...
The effects of the Uruguay round: Empirical evidence from U.S. industry
Contemporary Economic Policy ; ... different three-digit SIC industries reacted to news of the successful conclusion of the Uruguay ... the evening of December 15th, 1993, had news content.' Data for the construction of ... firms. A review of the Wall Street Journal News index suggests that there were no other ...
Uruguay Round answers from the experts. (Foreign Agriculture Service officials explain details of General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade)
AgExporter ; U.S. agricultural exporters are asking lots of questions about how the new Uruguay Round agreement will affect them if it is ratified. The general provisions of the agreement and their impact on specific food and agricultural products are described elsewhere in this issue of AgExpoder. In the
The Uruguay Round: results and implications.
World Economic Outlook ; The Final Act of the Uruguay Round agreement was signed in April 1994 and will become effective in 1995 after ratification by national legislatures. The Uruguay Round will substantially reduce tariff and nontariff trade barriers in many sectors, strengthen multilateral disciplines and extend them
Implications of the Uruguay Round Agreement for South Asia: The Case of Agriculture
Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics ; Implications of the Uruguay Round Agreement for South Asia: The Case of Agriculture, Benoit Blarel, Garry Pursell and Alberto Valdes, The World Bank, Washington, D.C., U.S.A.; Allied Publishers Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, 1999. Pp. xiii + 220. Rs. 300.00. The economic policy making in South Asia with
Agriculture and the GATT: new rules of the road for trade. (includes related articles about export benefits and rules for settling trade disputes)
AgExporter ; ... were put to work to analyze the potential implications for U.S. agricultural trade, farm income and jobs. The results spell good news for U.S. producers and exporters. The economic analysis contrasts the expected effects of the agreement, if adopted in 1995 ...
URUGUAY ROUND AGREEMENT UPDATES.(Brief Article)
The Food Institute Report ; URUGUAY ROUND AGREEMENT UPDATES: USDA has updated the quantity trigger levels for products that may be subject to additional import duties under the safeguard provisions of the Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture. For more information contact: Charles K. Bertsch, Foreign Agricultural Service,
First Book on Uruguay Round Agreement Published in China, XINHUA
Xinhua (China) ; Xinhua (China) 05-23-2000 BEIJING, May 23 (Xinhua) -- The Chinese edition of "The Guide to Uruguay Round Agreement", the first book ever compiled by the World Trade Organization (WTO), was recently published in Beijing. The book designed to offer a comprehensive introduction to the Uruguay round
Is GATT fulfilling promises for U.S. firms?
San Diego Business Journal ; Tariffs have dropped; national, state exports increasing substantially In December 1994, Congress enacted legislation implementing the Uruguay Round multilateral trade agreement entered into by the United States and more than 100 other countries under the auspices of the General Agreement on
An End to Agricultural Subsidy Wars
The Washington Post ; Sir James Goldsmith's recent attack on the Uruguay Round agreement {Outlook, Sept. 25} deserves a strong rebuttal. His allegation that developing countries will be devastated by the agricultural reform brought about by the Uruguay Round is completely unfounded. In fact, as a group, the developing