|
"Fantastiquant mille monstres bossus": poetic incongruities, poetic epiphanies, and the writerly semiosis of Pierre De Ronsard.
The Romanic Review
|
March 1, 1993|
|
COPYRIGHT 1993 Columbia University. This material is published under license from the publisher through the Gale Group, Farmington Hills, Michigan. All inquiries regarding rights should be directed to the Gale Group.
(Hide copyright information)
Copyright
|
In his latest study on an intriguing subject that was for him both "exhilarating" and "exasperating," Murray Krieger defines ekphrasis in these terms: "the literary representation of visual art, real or imaginary." The kind of ekphrasis that deals with the "real" is of course the art of mimesis, what Krieger calls "enargeia I," that is, the "sensible" or sense-oriented perception and portrayal of the mimetic real. Ekphrasis which strives to capture the "imaginary," a writer's art of semiosis, Krieger discusses as "enargeia II," that is, the "intelligible" or mind-oriented ...
Find more facts and information related to the
article ""Fantastiquant mille monstres bossus": poetic ..."