Model Penal Code section 2.02(7) and willful blindness.

From: Yale Law Journal | Date: June 1, 1993| Author: Marcus, Jonathan L. | Copyright information

The requisite knowledge necessary to justify the imposition of criminal liability should be defined more broadly to resolve contradictory applications of the Model Penal Code's willful blindness exception to criminal liability. Without redefining knowledge to distinguish between purposeful and genuine ignorance, circuit courts will continue to issue contradictory standards of legal guilt.

Courts and criminal law scholars have struggled for decades to sort out the relationship betwe...

Related newspaper, magazine, and journal articles from HighBeam Research

Model Penal Code section 2.02(7) and willful blindness.
Yale Law Journal ; Courts and criminal law scholars have struggled for decades to sort out the relationship between the basic concept of knowledge, which is central to our notions of criminal responsibility, and the concept of willful blindness. (1) According to the Model Penal Code (the Code2) knowledge of a fact is
Cheney's words ring much truer than he may have realized.(News)
Daily Herald (Arlington Heights, IL) ; Byline: Jack Mabley Vice President Dick Cheney warns the American people that we must not give in to wishful thinking and willful blindness that Iraq will not attack the United States. He's right. Wishful thinking and willful blindness should never substitute for reason and logic. Let's apply
Let's hear it for 'willful blindness'
Chicago Sun-Times ; Those of us who want President Bush to make the case against Iraq are getting our wish. Just the other day Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld disclosed intelligence information about al-Qaida terrorists taking shelter right under Saddam Hussein's nose. Reports persist of a terrorist training camp
Fight for Flight
The Washington Post ; Good news for those who fly the friendly government skies. Two spanking new Boeing 757s have arrived to replace some of those 40-year-old ...
A lesser standard for the president?
Chicago Sun-Times ; As I read through the report of the House and Senate Iran-contra committee, I experienced a sense of deja vu. Just a few weeks earlier, I had read the opinion of the First Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in the case of a lawyer I had represented. There were striking similarities between the findings