The fourth amendment and new technologies: constitutional myths and the case for caution.

From: Michigan Law Review | Date: March 1, 2004| Author: Kerr, Orin S. | Copyright information 
TABLE OF CONTENTS 
 
INTRODUCTION 
     I. THE FOURTH AMENDMENT AND THE DEFERENCE NORM 
        IN NEW TECHNOLOGIES 
        A. Property Law and the Fourth Amendment 
        B. Katz v. United States and the Property-Based View 
        C. The Deference Norm in New Technologies 
        D. Property-Defeating Surveillance Technologies: Knotts, 
           Karo, and Kyllo 
        E. Why the Fourth Amendment Alone Cannot Protect 
           Privacy in New Technologies 
    II. WIRETAPPING L...

Read all of this article with a FREE trial to HighBeam Research

Related newspaper, magazine, and journal articles from HighBeam Research

The fourth amendment and new technologies: constitutional myths and the case for caution.
Michigan Law Review ; TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION I. THE FOURTH AMENDMENT AND THE DEFERENCE NORM IN NEW TECHNOLOGIES A. Property Law and the Fourth Amendment B. Katz v. United States and the Property-Based View C. The Deference Norm in New Technologies D. Property-Defeating Surveillance Technologies: Knotts, Karo,
What were they smoking?: the Supreme Court's latest step in a long, strange trip through the Fourth Amendment.(Supreme Court Review)
Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology ; Kyllo v. United States, 533 U.S. 27 (2001). I. INTRODUCTION In Kyllo v. United States, (1) the United States Supreme Court addressed whether the use of a thermal imager, which detects the patterns of heat escaping from a house, constitutes a search and requires a warrant under the Fourth Amendment.
The fourth amendment and the limits of theory: Local versus general theoretical knowledge
St. John's Law Review ; The commentators are remarkably unanimous: The Supreme Court cases construing the Fourth Amendment are a mess that lacks coherence and predictability, and fails to communicate the contours of the field.1 They attribute all this to the same problem: There is no general theoretical knowledge of the
Watch what you type: As the FBI records your keystrokes, the fourth amendment develops carpal tunnel syndrome
The American Criminal Law Review ; INTRODUCTION The headline of a recent issue of The Onion, a weekly satirical newspaper, reads "Bill of Rights Pared Down to A Manageable Six,"1 and explains how President George W. Bush and Attorney General John Ashcroft have "streamlined" the Bill of Rights by striking, inter alia, the Fourth
Kaupp v. Texas: breathing life into the Fourth Amendment.
Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology ; I. INTRODUCTION In Kaupp v. Texas, the United States Supreme Court held that the Fourth Amendment was violated when police officers, without probable cause, went to Robert Kaupp's house in the middle of the night, awakened him, handcuffed him, and brought him to the police station for questioning.