Not the King's Bench.(United States Supreme Court being the highest court of original jurisdiction but having no power to issue prerogative writs)

From: Constitutional Commentary | Date: June 22, 2003| Author: Hartnett, Edward A. | Copyright information

Speaking at a public birthday party for an icon, even if the honoree is one or two hundred years old, can be a surprisingly tricky business. Short of turning the party into a roast, it seems rude to criticize the birthday boy too harshly. On the other hand, it is at least as important to avoid unwarranted and exaggerated praise. (1) The difficult task, then, is to try to say something remotely new or interesting while navigating that strait.

The conference organizers did...

Related newspaper, magazine, and journal articles from HighBeam Research

Not the King's Bench.(United States Supreme Court being the highest court of original jurisdiction but having no power to issue prerogative writs)
Constitutional Commentary ; Speaking at a public birthday party for an icon, even if the honoree is one or two hundred years old, can be a surprisingly tricky business. Short of turning the party into a roast, it seems rude to criticize the birthday boy too harshly. On the other hand, it is at least as important to avoid
Judicial lobbying and the politics of judicial structure: An examination of the Judiciary Act of 1925*
Justice System Journal ; This article examines the circumstances surrounding the passage of the Judiciary Act of 1925. It considers how the Court was able to lobby successfully for a measure that significantly expanded the Court's certiorari jurisdiction and, consequently, its policymaking authority. What factors best
Marbury v. Madison: a landmark decision made 200 years ago changed the Supreme Court forever. (American History).
Junior Scholastic ; On the cold, rainy morning of March 4, 1801, Chief Justice John Marshall administered the oath of office to Thomas Jefferson, the third President of the U.S. Jefferson and Marshall were cousins who had grown up together in Virginia. Both had shown an early interest in the law, and both became
How many judges does it take to make a Supreme Court?
Constitutional Commentary ; How many judges does it take to make a supreme court? Three? Five? Seven? Nine? Or more? If state as well as federal courts are considered, all answers have been correct at one time or another, in one court or another. State constitutions sometimes set the number of judges; sometimes, like the U.S.
Supreme Court shift favors employers; Bush appointees make pro-business rulings more likely in workplace rights cases.(analysis of labor law)
Business Insurance ; Byline: Gerald L. Maatman Jr. The Supreme Court's 2006/2007 term has enhanced expectations for employers and employment practices liability insurers looking for a leveling of the EPLI playing field. Plaintiffs took it on the chin in workplace rights cases, and employers chalked up significant